Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 29rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Baldric. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Becvause in his mind, he hasn't done anything wrong.

Remember, that's the same mind that thinks forcing democracy on another nation by military invasion and then wondering why terrorists come to blow up British people is a sane way to look at things.
Question Author


He really is delusional if he believes that.
I have said before - it is human nature for each of us to think the best of ourselves.

I don't imagine Tony Blair looks at his reflection when tying his tie in the mornings and says "You are an immoral warmonger with innocent blood on your hands because you wanted to salve your ego by being a 'saviour' at the expense of the lives of thousands of people."

How could he live with himself.

Instead, Tony does what we all do, he thinks he is OK, not perfect, but OK.

To live with the reality would be too hard for anyone, so delusion has to be the way.

Question Author


it must have cost him quite a few Hail Marys over the years
I agree with A-H.
People have to make important decisions based on the facts as they are presented.
People have short memories: Iraq declared war on Iran and used biochemical warfare, as they did against their own people in Northern Iran. Iraq conducted hostilities against Kuwait .......
Saddam Hussein continued a tyrannical rule over his people.
It was suggested that a UK firm was providing material for a gun that could deliver nuclear and biological warheads to Israel and other middle eastern countries.
S.H consistently refused the UN permission to inspect Iraq for nuclear and biological stores ( which as it happened didn't exist)
Suspicion was high that Iraq caused a real threat to the Middle East and to oil to the rest of the world.
A decision needed to be made....Blair with the support of Parliament......made it.
For me, Blair is blameless, he made a decision and has every right to be at the unveiling.
Sqad - I think on the basis of your post, you meant to say that you disagree with me!
Andy....LOL.....some of your answers seem so convoluted, that i am never sure whether i agree with you or not.
I will go with whatever you say ;-)
Sqad - it's easy to work out what I say - look for a key phrase like 'immoral warmonger' and you can deduce where I am coming from.

Do the same with your post - 'Blair is blameless' and that shows your view.

Trust me - you disagree with me!!!!
Arrogant SoB has no shame.
Sqad - YMB disagrees with you, and agrees with me - just so you know.
'Andy....LOL.....some of your answers seem so convoluted'

Only some?
jackdaw - My post was five sentences, separated by a space each.

Sqad's was seven sentences, running together.

I may post convoluted posts, but I am far from being the only one.

If you want to have another pointless pop, check the evidence first.
Good old Saint Tony, legend in his own mind! Mikey and the noo Layba crowd still love him!
They have to TTT, the Bliar/Bottler Government will be the last one they will ever have unless they seriously pull their finger out.
Question Author


Corbinladen was there with him!
I was about to castigate him as usual, but read Sqad's post and floundered a bit ...
hereIam - Please read my post, it will enable you to come to a balanced conclusion,
Question Author

Blameless my ***!

///Mr Blair's appearance comes less than a year since he appeared unrepentent after the Chilcot Report into the Iraq War was highly critical of his administration and found "military action at the time was not a last resort".///
Labour Party (254), Conservative Party (146), Ulster Unionist Party (6), Democratic Unionist Party (5), Independent Conservative (1)

These were the results of the "aye" vote out of 649 (roughly)...so pretty much "all Party support" for the war.

A decision was then taken....THEN.........easy to look back eh? and criticise.

don't know, i ask myself how many of those who voted him in, three terms remember now think he a different party.

1 to 20 of 29rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

How Did This Odious Man ...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.