Sandy Rotary - Games C/D 11/1/25
Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Shots Fired
...outside parliament. Place reportedly in lockdown. No further details yet.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Jackdaw33. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Not Lily, Nom, but one of her ilk for you. ;)
https:/
https:/
Gromit
'Togo,
You should read this
// The overwhelming majority of people arrested for alleged terrorism offences over the past 15 years have been freed without charge or conviction, official figures show.'
No doubt because the majority of them have accepted 'control orders' or started working with us.
Because of the SJW's it can be awkward/risky to introduce some of the evidence in open court, so it's easier if they accept control orders.(depending who they are and the nature of the evidence)
'Togo,
You should read this
// The overwhelming majority of people arrested for alleged terrorism offences over the past 15 years have been freed without charge or conviction, official figures show.'
No doubt because the majority of them have accepted 'control orders' or started working with us.
Because of the SJW's it can be awkward/risky to introduce some of the evidence in open court, so it's easier if they accept control orders.(depending who they are and the nature of the evidence)
Naomi - // Rather than offer a reasoned critique of the content of her work, which would be a far better way to discredit her, you restrict your comments to personal attacks. //
Nothing I have said attacks Ms. Hopkins personally - it attacks what she writes, and the way she writes it.
It is about her writing - not her.
I could be critical of her if I thought for one moment that anything in any of her columns was sincerely meant, and what she believes to be true.
The 'personality' she uses to write with is a media construct - she s a sinister opinion-massager, that's what she is paid for.
I am sure that away from the nonsense of her writing, she is a perfectly nice person.
Nothing I have said attacks Ms. Hopkins personally - it attacks what she writes, and the way she writes it.
It is about her writing - not her.
I could be critical of her if I thought for one moment that anything in any of her columns was sincerely meant, and what she believes to be true.
The 'personality' she uses to write with is a media construct - she s a sinister opinion-massager, that's what she is paid for.
I am sure that away from the nonsense of her writing, she is a perfectly nice person.
// No doubt because the majority of them have accepted 'control orders' or started working with us. //
is there ANY evidence for this statement ?
or does it have to be true because it had been stated by one of the usual suspects so must be true
[and of course any evidence is SECRET so we will never know.
we just have to accept that those who do know are telling the truth. - you know like they did over the IRA bombing campaign]
is there ANY evidence for this statement ?
or does it have to be true because it had been stated by one of the usual suspects so must be true
[and of course any evidence is SECRET so we will never know.
we just have to accept that those who do know are telling the truth. - you know like they did over the IRA bombing campaign]
Peter Pedant
/// are we discussing Katya because we think she may be the knife-person and driver of the
car ///
/// or are we discussing her because it has absolutely nothing to do with the OP of this thread ///
Neither Kate Hopkins wrote a piece appertaining to the subject of this thread, I then entered it so as to inject a little more valid reasoning to the thread.
But as usual it was like showing a red rag to a bull, and those affected could not wait to come out with their own personal insults towards 'our' Katie.
/// are we discussing Katya because we think she may be the knife-person and driver of the
car ///
/// or are we discussing her because it has absolutely nothing to do with the OP of this thread ///
Neither Kate Hopkins wrote a piece appertaining to the subject of this thread, I then entered it so as to inject a little more valid reasoning to the thread.
But as usual it was like showing a red rag to a bull, and those affected could not wait to come out with their own personal insults towards 'our' Katie.
AOG - //Neither Kate Hopkins wrote a piece appertaining to the subject of this thread, I then entered it so as to inject a little more valid reasoning to the thread. //
The fact that you use the words 'Katie Hopkins' and 'valid reasoning' in the same sentence suggests that you are part of her target audience - people who need to be spoon-fed dreamed-up emotional claptrap passing as 'opinion' in order to give them an opinion because they don't actually have one.
Whatever our differences, that is clearly not you.
The fact that you use the words 'Katie Hopkins' and 'valid reasoning' in the same sentence suggests that you are part of her target audience - people who need to be spoon-fed dreamed-up emotional claptrap passing as 'opinion' in order to give them an opinion because they don't actually have one.
Whatever our differences, that is clearly not you.
Islay
/// I cannot believe some of the rubbish being spouted on here. Personally I would have thought that some of you would have learned your lesson after naming the terrorist as someone who was no where near the incident!! Pathetic!! ///
You couldn't possibly be referring to Channel 4 could you?
http://
/// I cannot believe some of the rubbish being spouted on here. Personally I would have thought that some of you would have learned your lesson after naming the terrorist as someone who was no where near the incident!! Pathetic!! ///
You couldn't possibly be referring to Channel 4 could you?
http://
Latest Posts
Technology2 mins ago
Home & Garden4 mins ago
ChatterBank8 mins ago
Crosswords12 mins ago
Crosswords13 mins ago
