ChatterBank0 min ago
Can An Accurate Assesment Be Deemed "blasphemy"?
31 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think it can...
"blasphemy
ˈblasfəmi/Submit
noun
the action or offence of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; profane talk.
"he was detained on charges of blasphemy"
synonyms: profanity, profaneness, sacrilege, irreligiousness, irreverence, taking the Lord's name in vain, swearing, curse, cursing, impiety, impiousness, ungodliness, unholiness, desecration, disrespect; formalimprecation; archaicexecration
"he was condemned for his blasphemy"
It doesn't say whether it needs to be accurate or not.
"blasphemy
ˈblasfəmi/Submit
noun
the action or offence of speaking sacrilegiously about God or sacred things; profane talk.
"he was detained on charges of blasphemy"
synonyms: profanity, profaneness, sacrilege, irreligiousness, irreverence, taking the Lord's name in vain, swearing, curse, cursing, impiety, impiousness, ungodliness, unholiness, desecration, disrespect; formalimprecation; archaicexecration
"he was condemned for his blasphemy"
It doesn't say whether it needs to be accurate or not.
I think Mr Fry is basically saying if "god" exists then he's doing a pretty awful job at the same time as implying that he clearly does not exist. I think that his assessment is accurate and that may be blasphemy but really it's a nonsensical determination when clearly all he's doing is assessing what is actually happening.
I have to agree with Zacs on this one.
The monologue during which Mr Fry was deemed to have committed the offence of blasphemy was clearly not only stating the indefensible cruelty of 'God', but simultaneously putting forward the fundamental position of the confirmed atheist - which effectively says that there is no 'God' and bad things do happen, just because they happen.
The monologue during which Mr Fry was deemed to have committed the offence of blasphemy was clearly not only stating the indefensible cruelty of 'God', but simultaneously putting forward the fundamental position of the confirmed atheist - which effectively says that there is no 'God' and bad things do happen, just because they happen.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.