Donate SIGN UP

Is 6 Years Long Enough For These Savages?

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 14:46 Tue 27th Jun 2017 | News
41 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-40416578
Surely "life" should mean life.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//Ringleader Zahid Zaman, 43, was told he must serve a minimum term of 33 years and Ann Corbett, 26, at least 27 years. //
Where do you get six years from?
No it is not they should all have got 'life means life' except the ringleader Zaman who should have got a short rope long drop. This was a particular nasty murder of a vulnerable man who was tortured for months and forced to eat his own testicle.

But then what do you expect from a liberal left judiciary?
The other two Islay, taking into account most only serve half their sentence.
Question Author
I thought I saw 12 years for one, but they are let out after half the sentence anyway which makes a mockery of the whole thing. 33 years is better but they'll still get out after 16 with life to live. They should not see the light of day again in my opinion, disgusting low life savages.
Question Author
interesting that Islay first tries to attack me rather than condemning these savages. Ably demonstrating the priorities of the right on brigade.
You did see 12 years for one and 9 for another.

33 years - a joke. Should be doing the Saddam shuffle.

Evil scum this lot.
The ringleader got a MINIMUM off 33.
Without knowing the full details of what the two on lower sentences did (and not wishing to know ) I can't comment but the Courts saw the evidence.

Zaman and Corbett 'must' serve 33/27 years respectively and of course no amount of time is never going to be enough for what they did.
I didn't attach you, stop being such a prima donna!!
I simply asked where you got 6 years from!
33/27 years is the minimum time they must serve. No getting out half way through.
Question Author
33 years? Better, multiply by 3 and we are there.
It doesn't mean he'll get out in 33 years.
33 and 27 is better than I expected and as it's a 'minimum', they still may not get out then, thank goodness.
I do not want to even begin understanding why some human looking folk behave like that to human beings.
Shame we can't treat the perpetrators the same way as they did their victims, But I don't want to stopp as low as they have.
Hope they rot
We get the same response on here, whenever court cases come up. How do people know that these people will get out after half their term is served ?

"Ringleader Zahid Zaman, 43, was told he must serve a minimum term of 33 years and Ann Corbett, 26, at least 27 years"

These are hardly soft sentences. This case sickens me as much as anybody else, but to keep calling for the rope is just peeing in the wind. The death penalty will never come back in Britain, because it will never deter people like this.
Even when Britain had the death penalty, it didn't deter folk from committing murder.
Death penalty works well in the US (not).


On the other side of the coin, with DNA and other advances for proving nasty stuff, maybe, just maybe there might be a reason for bringing death penalty back? (Don't agree with state sponsored murder btw)
Nothing will deter the scum like these two or the evil murderers of other innocent people until the spectre of the hangman re-appears.
Remember the 40 year campaign by the great and good to prove Hanratty was innocent and unjustly hanged? DNA put paid to that rubbish.
So Hanratty wasn't innocent ??
I agree that the death penalty doesn't deter people like this. They just don't think they will ever get caught because to them they are not really doing anything wrong!!!

We are after all only human and some of us don't see the point of allowing people like this to blot the landscape, take up airspace and drain our resources.

We would rather hey be consigned to the hole they belong in and sent their poor victims to.

That I understand is why we have the judiciary to make sure we don't go rampaging about giving street justice.

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is 6 Years Long Enough For These Savages?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.