ChatterBank7 mins ago
The Barcelona Declaration 1995
Do you know what it was? if not, you really should, this was the gateway to "Eurasia".
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//43 leaders from Europe and the Mediterranean countries met (in Paris) with UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and EU Commission President José Manuel Barroso. In addition, representatives of the World Bank and the European Investment Bank, the Arab League, the Islamic Conference Organization and the Maghreb Union were present - a forum at the highest level. (Der Spiegel Online 14. July 2008).//
You would have thought that this was headline news back then, but no, secrecy was the order of the day. Now you know where Bliar and Meddlesome and the like get their massive overnight wealth.
http:// balder. org/avi sartikl er/Barc elona-D eclarat ion-Eur o-Medit erranea n-Engli sh-Vers ion-200 9.php
You would have thought that this was headline news back then, but no, secrecy was the order of the day. Now you know where Bliar and Meddlesome and the like get their massive overnight wealth.
http://
Instead of taking the word of a woman who doesn't even know the meaning of the word "decimated", you might like to check out the Wikipedia article. Although many of you will probably find it too long and detailed to cope with.
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Union _for_th e_Medit erranea n
https:/
Wikipedia? The font of all knowledge, or a vehicle for the manipulation of truth?
//Because of the nature of the site, there is an inherent weakness to the veracity of information posted there. This is why it is foolish for journalists to rely on Wikipedia for information and also why college professors refuse to allow students to cite Wikipedia in research papers.//
http:// wikiped iocracy .com/20 14/10/1 2/wikip edia-re -writin g-histo ry/
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/154 4737/Fa ke-Wiki pedia-p rof-alt ered-20 000-ent ries.ht ml
http:// sstibbs .com/sc ott/201 0_archi ves/blo g_2010_ 011.htm l
//Because of the nature of the site, there is an inherent weakness to the veracity of information posted there. This is why it is foolish for journalists to rely on Wikipedia for information and also why college professors refuse to allow students to cite Wikipedia in research papers.//
http://
http://
http://
I don't know why she said 70 mosques, she obviously knows there are more, 162 in Birmingham alone and at least 1,750 registered mosques in the UK, must have been a slip of the tongue.
Re. the word decimate;
Does ‘decimate’ mean ‘destroy one tenth’?
Most people have a linguistic pet peeve or two, a useful complaint about language that they can sound off about to show other people that they know how to wield the English language. Most of these peeves tend to be rather irrational, a quality which should in no way diminish the enjoyment of the complainer. A classic example of this is the word decimate.
The complaint about the word typically centers on the fact that decimate is used improperly to refer to ‘destroying a large portion of something’, when the ‘true’ meaning of the word is ‘to put to death (or punish) one of every ten’.
There are several problems with this complaint. The first, and most obvious, is that language has an ineluctable desire to change, and there are almost no words in English which have been around for more than a few hundred years without taking on new meanings, changing their old ones, or coming to simultaneously mean one thing and the opposite (a type of word known as a contronym).
Oxford Dictionaries
Re. the word decimate;
Does ‘decimate’ mean ‘destroy one tenth’?
Most people have a linguistic pet peeve or two, a useful complaint about language that they can sound off about to show other people that they know how to wield the English language. Most of these peeves tend to be rather irrational, a quality which should in no way diminish the enjoyment of the complainer. A classic example of this is the word decimate.
The complaint about the word typically centers on the fact that decimate is used improperly to refer to ‘destroying a large portion of something’, when the ‘true’ meaning of the word is ‘to put to death (or punish) one of every ten’.
There are several problems with this complaint. The first, and most obvious, is that language has an ineluctable desire to change, and there are almost no words in English which have been around for more than a few hundred years without taking on new meanings, changing their old ones, or coming to simultaneously mean one thing and the opposite (a type of word known as a contronym).
Oxford Dictionaries
Entirely unrelated to the OP, but on the subject of "decimated", there was a story some time ago, possibly in Readers' Digest, about a woman moaning loudly to her daughter about a fox having "decimalised" her chickens. But surely you mean "decimated", the daughter asked?
"No, I mean decimalised. I used to have 12, but after the fox came I have 10."
"No, I mean decimalised. I used to have 12, but after the fox came I have 10."
:0) She sounds like Dickens' Mrs Gamp, jim.
I've no wish to labour the point here on the thread, but if anyone is interested there is lots more from where I took my quote;
http:// blog.ox forddic tionari es.com/ 2012/09 /does-d ecimate -mean-d estroy- one-ten th/
I've no wish to labour the point here on the thread, but if anyone is interested there is lots more from where I took my quote;
http://
//Although many of you will probably find it too long and detailed to cope with. //
Nope it is pretty straight forward, although the reader does need to have a working knowledge of "Newspeak". A covert social experiment that is being steered and presided over by "Executives" and a Secretariat (or Bailiwick if you please) who are not elected by the people on whom they have the most destructive impact, but appointed, in secret, by the "people" who have most to gain from the folly.
Nope it is pretty straight forward, although the reader does need to have a working knowledge of "Newspeak". A covert social experiment that is being steered and presided over by "Executives" and a Secretariat (or Bailiwick if you please) who are not elected by the people on whom they have the most destructive impact, but appointed, in secret, by the "people" who have most to gain from the folly.
Further to Michael Black's excellent video posted above (thanks for the name togo) this;
EU: Delusions without Borders
by Judith Bergman • September 21, 2017 at 5:00 am
◾Many migrants simply refused to leave, disappeared, or their home countries refused to receive them.
◾The European Commission published a "report card" on the EU member states' "progress" in taking the allocated quotas of migrants. Even Sweden, on the brink of societal collapse from the influx of migrants, was told that it was only "close" to reaching its quota.
◾ISIS apparently has at its disposal some 11,000 stolen blank Syrian passports that it could put to use in order to smuggle its terrorists into Europe under fake identities; at the same time, more European ISIS fighters are expected to return to Europe. Why does the EU want to make it easy for them?
EU: Delusions without Borders
by Judith Bergman • September 21, 2017 at 5:00 am
◾Many migrants simply refused to leave, disappeared, or their home countries refused to receive them.
◾The European Commission published a "report card" on the EU member states' "progress" in taking the allocated quotas of migrants. Even Sweden, on the brink of societal collapse from the influx of migrants, was told that it was only "close" to reaching its quota.
◾ISIS apparently has at its disposal some 11,000 stolen blank Syrian passports that it could put to use in order to smuggle its terrorists into Europe under fake identities; at the same time, more European ISIS fighters are expected to return to Europe. Why does the EU want to make it easy for them?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.