I would have thought if you were going to quote Yeats in relation to the AFD in the German elections this would have been more apt ( from the same work no less).
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
//AOG, does the fact that the AfD want to stop mass immigration make all the other items which Mikey listed OK?//
The two things are not correlated. Which is, I think, the point the poster was trying to make. You can share an opinion of mass immigration while disagreeing about climate change or same-sex marriage nonsense
.
Yes, I suppose there's a problem with all single-issue groups like AfD and UKIP. To get representation you've got to create a political agenda. Manifestos and all that stuff. My guess is that AfD would split on conventional lines on all other issues (economic policy etc). I voted UKIP whenever I could, but didn't know (and cared less) what their stance was on any issue apart fro EU membership.
If opposition to same-sex marriage is "extreme", for example, then why would you invite a million people who are also opposed to same-sex marriage into your country? Is that or is that not a self-contradictory stance?