ChatterBank7 mins ago
Should This Savage Be Granted Compensation?
69 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-50 35517/L ee-Rigb y-murde rer-lau nches-2 5-000-c ourt-ca se-agai nst-MoJ .html
Well one of the judges seems to think highly of him.
/// 'He forms relationships easily,' the judge said. ///
/// 'He is charismatic. There is intelligence suggesting that he has had some influence on the conversion to Islam of some individuals.' ///
/// The judge added: 'There is a large group of people who look up to Adebolajo.' ///
Ah! that's nice isn't it? So pleased that he is getting along.
/// Mr Justice Langstaff said Adebolajo had not been given legal aid to pay for lawyers to represent him. ///
/// He said Adebolajo might have to represent himself at any trial and suggested that it would be in the interests of justice if public funding could be given. ///
/// 'If and when this case comes to trial it will be a great pity to justice, and in particular the presentation of the claimant's case, if some means were not found to ensure he had professional help,' said the judge.
'If that could be done by public funds all the better.' ///
Well one of the judges seems to think highly of him.
/// 'He forms relationships easily,' the judge said. ///
/// 'He is charismatic. There is intelligence suggesting that he has had some influence on the conversion to Islam of some individuals.' ///
/// The judge added: 'There is a large group of people who look up to Adebolajo.' ///
Ah! that's nice isn't it? So pleased that he is getting along.
/// Mr Justice Langstaff said Adebolajo had not been given legal aid to pay for lawyers to represent him. ///
/// He said Adebolajo might have to represent himself at any trial and suggested that it would be in the interests of justice if public funding could be given. ///
/// 'If and when this case comes to trial it will be a great pity to justice, and in particular the presentation of the claimant's case, if some means were not found to ensure he had professional help,' said the judge.
'If that could be done by public funds all the better.' ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.AOG
jackthehat was correct in criticising your interpretation of the article.
The judge wasn't praising Adebolajo. He was merely stating facts. Some of the world's worst villains have been charismatic. That's the source of their power.
Hitler was extremely charismatic.
(Yes, I know - Bodwin's Law and all that...)
jackthehat was correct in criticising your interpretation of the article.
The judge wasn't praising Adebolajo. He was merely stating facts. Some of the world's worst villains have been charismatic. That's the source of their power.
Hitler was extremely charismatic.
(Yes, I know - Bodwin's Law and all that...)
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Naomi - // And who's paying the compensation? Us. By simply keeping him alive he's costing us far more than he's worth anyway. //
The price we pay for being a civilised society and not sanctioning state-enhanced murder is that we, as tax payers, pay to keep prisoners alive.
Personally, I believe that is a price worth paying.
The price we pay for being a civilised society and not sanctioning state-enhanced murder is that we, as tax payers, pay to keep prisoners alive.
Personally, I believe that is a price worth paying.
Naomi - // Very noble of you. //
Nobility has nothing to do with it.
We can regard human life's worth as being measured in the cost of keeping a prisoner alive while he serves his sentence, or we can take a view that human life is not measured in monetary terms, nor should it be.
We can act with a casual disregard for life, as some on here clearly do, but in my view, that lowers us to the mentality of the extremists, and I don't want to ally my thinking with theirs.
It's a matter of conscience, not 'nobility' - but I know you are more than intelligent enough to know that, and disappointed that you felt the need to be sarcastic about it.
Nobility has nothing to do with it.
We can regard human life's worth as being measured in the cost of keeping a prisoner alive while he serves his sentence, or we can take a view that human life is not measured in monetary terms, nor should it be.
We can act with a casual disregard for life, as some on here clearly do, but in my view, that lowers us to the mentality of the extremists, and I don't want to ally my thinking with theirs.
It's a matter of conscience, not 'nobility' - but I know you are more than intelligent enough to know that, and disappointed that you felt the need to be sarcastic about it.
ummmm - //And your thoughts on him receiving compensation, Andy? //h
I believe that if the prisoner's counsel can prove that he has been illegally treated, then compensation is his right, but whether or not that compensation should actually go to him is another matter.
Perhaps such compensation should be offered to the victims of violent crime - I am sure that the prisoner would not object.
While the self-righteous brothers queue up on here to try and outdo each other in terms of who can be the most morally outraged, combined with who can invent the most painful retribution, I reiterate the point I have always made in situations like this -
Our laws are what make us civilised, they are what make us different from the terrorists. Those laws has to be applied fairly and without favour, or they become meaningless.
The law dictates that the punishment for murder is incarceration, not incarceration without rights, or inhumane treatment and so on.
Do I find it repugnant that this man has recourse to law? Yes I do, but I find the alternative far more unacceptable, so I will accept it, and accept the legal process and decision when they are completed.
I believe that if the prisoner's counsel can prove that he has been illegally treated, then compensation is his right, but whether or not that compensation should actually go to him is another matter.
Perhaps such compensation should be offered to the victims of violent crime - I am sure that the prisoner would not object.
While the self-righteous brothers queue up on here to try and outdo each other in terms of who can be the most morally outraged, combined with who can invent the most painful retribution, I reiterate the point I have always made in situations like this -
Our laws are what make us civilised, they are what make us different from the terrorists. Those laws has to be applied fairly and without favour, or they become meaningless.
The law dictates that the punishment for murder is incarceration, not incarceration without rights, or inhumane treatment and so on.
Do I find it repugnant that this man has recourse to law? Yes I do, but I find the alternative far more unacceptable, so I will accept it, and accept the legal process and decision when they are completed.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.