ChatterBank0 min ago
Guilty Until Proven Innocent?
43 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/en tertain ment-ar ts-4192 5767
I have no idea what is alleged etc but really, it seems that Spacey has been summarily pronounced guilty.
I have no idea what is alleged etc but really, it seems that Spacey has been summarily pronounced guilty.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
10C....many crimes of a personal nature come down to one persons word against anothers. It up to the Police investigate and, in the case of Britain, the CPS to prefer charges.
Just because these type of crimes are difficult to investigate, doesn't mean that people shouldn't report them....its what the law is all about.....its the delivery of justice.
Just because these type of crimes are difficult to investigate, doesn't mean that people shouldn't report them....its what the law is all about.....its the delivery of justice.
No-one has found him guilty of anything, as everyone has repeatedly said, he's just a threat to the box office of the movie, so they've gone with another actor, that's not saying he's guilty, that's saying that the publicity surrounding him is deemed to be so negative that the work of hundreds of people and investors over the last 3 years or so would be put in jeopardy if he was to remain included in it, and that's not fair, so they have replaced him. It's simple. No-one attached to the film is necessarily assuming his guilt, it's a purely career led and financial decision.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is a legal phrase. Society is, and businesses are, free to disassociate from whomever it likes. And pragmatically it seems that they have little choice but to cut Spacey loose. Perhaps if he'd denied the charges altogether, rather than essentially owning up to them, then he might have stayed on. But he tried an unusual and underhand, and frankly disgusting, tactic to get loose ("sure, I may have abused kids, but I was drunk and also gay"), and frankly that sort of approach sealed his fate.
It may be difficult to prove the allegations in a court of law, so he may always remain legally innocent, but you don't have to wait for a guilty verdict to feel that keeping someone close is bad for your reputation and profits.
It may be difficult to prove the allegations in a court of law, so he may always remain legally innocent, but you don't have to wait for a guilty verdict to feel that keeping someone close is bad for your reputation and profits.
He has been ‘tried’ and found guilty – if he hadn’t he wouldn’t have been deemed a liability - but I don’t agree that he’s handled it badly. I can’t think of another man who’s been accused in this current maelstrom who has said he will be examining his own behaviour. That sounds pretty honest to me.