Inflation Rockets By 13% In A Sigle...
News0 min ago
Yet Another Example Of A So Called 'asylum Seeker' Who Has Taken This Country For A Ride, Big Time.
18 Answers
http://
Interesting to note however that without the so called 'RAGS' we might never get to hear about them.
15 months in jail for the amount in cash that this scrounger has cost the British tax payer is disgusting.
Interesting to note however that without the so called 'RAGS' we might never get to hear about them.
15 months in jail for the amount in cash that this scrounger has cost the British tax payer is disgusting.
Answers
1 to 18 of 18
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"The system is at fault for not having enough resources to check up on every asylum seeker. But that would cost the British tax payer a damn site more than £40k."
So by that reasoning then, Zacs, because it is too difficult or expensive to stop paying them benefits and track them down, we should allow every waif and stray who fancies a cushy life to arrive and settle here, give them a council flat and allow them to pick our pockets via the benefits system.
So by that reasoning then, Zacs, because it is too difficult or expensive to stop paying them benefits and track them down, we should allow every waif and stray who fancies a cushy life to arrive and settle here, give them a council flat and allow them to pick our pockets via the benefits system.
I’m not sure where to begin criticising your post NJ, but let’s have a stab:
Not every asylum seeker makes fraudulent claims. In fact I’m pretty sure it’s a very small percentage. So that means I’m not in favour of ‘allowing every waif and stray who fancies a cushy life to arrive and settle here‘.
You seem to have done the classic AB response of assuming because I say one thing, I mean another.
I thought you were better than that but you are patently capable of sinking to AOGs levels of ‘reasoning’ when you think it suits.
Not every asylum seeker makes fraudulent claims. In fact I’m pretty sure it’s a very small percentage. So that means I’m not in favour of ‘allowing every waif and stray who fancies a cushy life to arrive and settle here‘.
You seem to have done the classic AB response of assuming because I say one thing, I mean another.
I thought you were better than that but you are patently capable of sinking to AOGs levels of ‘reasoning’ when you think it suits.
“You seem to have done the classic AB response of assuming because I say one thing, I mean another.”
I’ve done no such thing, Zacs.
“Not every asylum seeker makes fraudulent claims.”
Indeed not and I never suggested they do. But many do.
It is a fair assumption to make that, when you mention the cost of policing these fraudulent claims, you accept that a level of fraud is acceptable to defer the costs of that policing. You compared the cost to the taxpayer this particular gentleman thrust on the taxpayer by his lies and deception saying that effective policing would probably cost more. I don’t see any conclusion to reach other than that we should accept the occasional chancer such as Mr Qoomaal in our midst as a fair price to pay to save us the cost of catching people such as him. Even if somebody has done the sums and correctly determined that you are right, it makes in none the less acceptable.
I’ve done no such thing, Zacs.
“Not every asylum seeker makes fraudulent claims.”
Indeed not and I never suggested they do. But many do.
It is a fair assumption to make that, when you mention the cost of policing these fraudulent claims, you accept that a level of fraud is acceptable to defer the costs of that policing. You compared the cost to the taxpayer this particular gentleman thrust on the taxpayer by his lies and deception saying that effective policing would probably cost more. I don’t see any conclusion to reach other than that we should accept the occasional chancer such as Mr Qoomaal in our midst as a fair price to pay to save us the cost of catching people such as him. Even if somebody has done the sums and correctly determined that you are right, it makes in none the less acceptable.
1 to 18 of 18
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.