ChatterBank0 min ago
Finally China See Sense....
10 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/wo rld-asi a-42464 011
Cutting petrol exports to NK to 10% of what they were, that's gotta hurt.
Cutting petrol exports to NK to 10% of what they were, that's gotta hurt.
Answers
Hi TTT They did - like I said it is complex. China knows it has the luxury of time - they are playing a long game to return to the situation they have known for the last 10,000 years (with the exception of the last 200). That is to say, world dominance. They have a range of tools: economic, cyber, military, soft power; media control to drive this agenda forward....
09:28 Sun 24th Dec 2017
I think the situation is a lot more complex than even the BBC can relate. Certainly Trump's chief advisor on China, Peter Navarro is no expert on either China or the DPRK (see here: http:// foreign policy. com/201 7/03/13 /peter- navarro -profil e-natio nal-tra de-coun cil-don ald-tru mp-chin a-exper t/ )
I go to China three or four times per year and talk a lot to the people there - both Chinese and Chna-friendly westerners.
China wants to avoid two things: war (or nuclear strike) on its own territory and refugees coming from DPRK into Liaoning and other nearby Provinces.
China also wants the US to remove the THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Air defence) missile system from south Korea. That has a radar that can see around 2000km. Beijing is 1000 km from Seoul; Hong Kong is 2000km from Seoul. That radar can see deep into Chinese territory. The Chinese see THAAD as an aggressive act by the USA.
We know there have been discussinos between US and China over THAAD in which China has promised to stop DPRK's weapons development programmes if the US removes THAAD.
The US has turned down that offer.
Ask yourself, how did DPRK develop nuclear fusion bombs (H-bombs) and ultra-long range ballistic missiles in the space of a couple of years. It is simply not possible without external help. That means either Russia or China.
I am convinced China has been helping DPRK with these systems in order to introduce uncertainty into the foreign relations environment to convince the USA to remove the THAAD system from S Korea.
Trouble is, Trump is calling their bluff. I guess the Trump supporters see that as courageous; others see it as foolhardy.
The key is persuading China that it is in their own interests to stop supporting DPRK. You do not do that by making conditions in DPRK even more deprived. You do it by treating China with some respect.
IMHO.
I go to China three or four times per year and talk a lot to the people there - both Chinese and Chna-friendly westerners.
China wants to avoid two things: war (or nuclear strike) on its own territory and refugees coming from DPRK into Liaoning and other nearby Provinces.
China also wants the US to remove the THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Air defence) missile system from south Korea. That has a radar that can see around 2000km. Beijing is 1000 km from Seoul; Hong Kong is 2000km from Seoul. That radar can see deep into Chinese territory. The Chinese see THAAD as an aggressive act by the USA.
We know there have been discussinos between US and China over THAAD in which China has promised to stop DPRK's weapons development programmes if the US removes THAAD.
The US has turned down that offer.
Ask yourself, how did DPRK develop nuclear fusion bombs (H-bombs) and ultra-long range ballistic missiles in the space of a couple of years. It is simply not possible without external help. That means either Russia or China.
I am convinced China has been helping DPRK with these systems in order to introduce uncertainty into the foreign relations environment to convince the USA to remove the THAAD system from S Korea.
Trouble is, Trump is calling their bluff. I guess the Trump supporters see that as courageous; others see it as foolhardy.
The key is persuading China that it is in their own interests to stop supporting DPRK. You do not do that by making conditions in DPRK even more deprived. You do it by treating China with some respect.
IMHO.
Hi TTT
They did - like I said it is complex. China knows it has the luxury of time - they are playing a long game to return to the situation they have known for the last 10,000 years (with the exception of the last 200). That is to say, world dominance.
They have a range of tools: economic, cyber, military, soft power; media control to drive this agenda forward.
Picking a battle with the UN now would not be wise. They see the disruption in the US and its steady withdrawal from world affairs to be a great opportunity to expand influence in Asia - especially the Pacific rim ('Belt' part of the Belt and Road initiative) and the landmass between China and Europe ('Road' part of the Belt and road initiative).
Hence the massive spending on infrastructure in all those regions.
This at a time when Trump ripped up the Trans-Pacific Partnership, that the US under Obama negotiated specifically to erode Chinese influence in the region.
President Xi knows he is in power for at least 10 years. Probably 15. This gives the Communist Party of China (CPP) time to out-wit the West.
Both Russia and China are working to de-stabilise Western democracies. In my opinion, they are succeeding.
Russia through fake news, twitter trolls and others; China through economic power, control of raw materials and media ownership.
I know almost nothing about this, compared to the real experts, but even I can see that the West is massively under-estimating the risks associated with Chinese expansionism.
Your mileage may vary. It's just an opinion.
They did - like I said it is complex. China knows it has the luxury of time - they are playing a long game to return to the situation they have known for the last 10,000 years (with the exception of the last 200). That is to say, world dominance.
They have a range of tools: economic, cyber, military, soft power; media control to drive this agenda forward.
Picking a battle with the UN now would not be wise. They see the disruption in the US and its steady withdrawal from world affairs to be a great opportunity to expand influence in Asia - especially the Pacific rim ('Belt' part of the Belt and Road initiative) and the landmass between China and Europe ('Road' part of the Belt and road initiative).
Hence the massive spending on infrastructure in all those regions.
This at a time when Trump ripped up the Trans-Pacific Partnership, that the US under Obama negotiated specifically to erode Chinese influence in the region.
President Xi knows he is in power for at least 10 years. Probably 15. This gives the Communist Party of China (CPP) time to out-wit the West.
Both Russia and China are working to de-stabilise Western democracies. In my opinion, they are succeeding.
Russia through fake news, twitter trolls and others; China through economic power, control of raw materials and media ownership.
I know almost nothing about this, compared to the real experts, but even I can see that the West is massively under-estimating the risks associated with Chinese expansionism.
Your mileage may vary. It's just an opinion.
//Finally China See Sense....//
I think it is time for America and the West to see sense, and there's a lot of it in Pat Buchanan's article here;
http:// takimag .com/ar ticle/w hat_sho uld_we_ fight_f or_patr ick_buc hanan/p rint#ax zz52BmV PKmB
I think it is time for America and the West to see sense, and there's a lot of it in Pat Buchanan's article here;
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.