News8 mins ago
We Are Such A Soft Touch, Why This Women Is Still Allowed To Hold A British Passport, Even If She Would Become Stateless Is Beyond Me?
41 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.ZM your link shows there is no right to a UK passport and UK citizens can be left stateless in certain scenarios,
"British citizens are not entitled to a British passport. The passport does not confer
citizenship; it is merely evidence of it. Passports are issued at the discretion of the
Home Secretary under the Royal Prerogative and can be withdrawn through the use of
the same discretionary power"
"The Home Secretary may make an order to deprive a person of
British citizenship status in any of the following circumstances:
• The Home Secretary considers that deprivation “is conducive to the public good”, and would not make the person stateless
(s40 (2); s40 (4));
• The person obtained his citizenship status through registration
or naturalisation, and the Home Secretary is satisfied that this was obtained by fraud, false representation or the concealment of any material fact (s40 (3));
• The person obtained his citizenship status through naturalisation, and the Home Secretary considers that deprivation is conducive to the public good because the person has conducted themselves “in a manner which is seriously prejudicial to the vital interests of the United Kingdom, any of the Islands, or any British overseas territory”, and the Home Secretary has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is able to become a national of another country or territory under its laws (s40 (4A)).
In the second and third scenarios, deprivation of citizenship is
permissible even if the person would be left stateless."
"British citizens are not entitled to a British passport. The passport does not confer
citizenship; it is merely evidence of it. Passports are issued at the discretion of the
Home Secretary under the Royal Prerogative and can be withdrawn through the use of
the same discretionary power"
"The Home Secretary may make an order to deprive a person of
British citizenship status in any of the following circumstances:
• The Home Secretary considers that deprivation “is conducive to the public good”, and would not make the person stateless
(s40 (2); s40 (4));
• The person obtained his citizenship status through registration
or naturalisation, and the Home Secretary is satisfied that this was obtained by fraud, false representation or the concealment of any material fact (s40 (3));
• The person obtained his citizenship status through naturalisation, and the Home Secretary considers that deprivation is conducive to the public good because the person has conducted themselves “in a manner which is seriously prejudicial to the vital interests of the United Kingdom, any of the Islands, or any British overseas territory”, and the Home Secretary has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is able to become a national of another country or territory under its laws (s40 (4A)).
In the second and third scenarios, deprivation of citizenship is
permissible even if the person would be left stateless."
-- answer removed --
// We were fighting the really bad guys that does not mean we were supporting Assad slightly less bad guys. //
I think you have lost the plot mate. UK Government and ISIS were fighting Assad’s regime.
If the British and US had been successful in removing Assad, Syria would now be part of Islamic State’s caliphate.
I think you have lost the plot mate. UK Government and ISIS were fighting Assad’s regime.
If the British and US had been successful in removing Assad, Syria would now be part of Islamic State’s caliphate.
no doubt I'm walking into som ZM semantic bowlocks but OK here goes: 13:35 "She went to Syria in support of fighters attacking Assad’s oppressive regime. Meanwhile the British Government were doing exactly the same. " - she went in support of (IS) fighters attacking Assad...... RIGHT?? now "Mean while the British Government were doing the same, ie also supporting IS fighters. RIGHT I read it ZM analysed it, OK?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.