ChatterBank1 min ago
Corbyn's Britain
Answers
Cassa....of course it wouldn't, so why does Spicey post such rubbish ?
20:29 Wed 27th Dec 2017
Corbyn's outdatedness and his manipulable nature are indeed prominent and very important criticisms of him. He's also less flexible than Clem was (and perhaps less intelligent), even if he shares much of the same principles. As you say, though, ich, the idea that electing Corbyn will result in slave labour, mass murder and a planned economy is fanciful.
You could argue that under the current administration, with zero hour contracts, the bedroom tax, the treatment of the disabled on benefits, and the unending austerity measures which disproportionally affect those on lower incomes, and the 'work til you drop' pension age, homelessness and the proliferation of food bank - we are already marching towards our own version of the gulag.
What Spicey has tried to do here, in his usual ham-fisted way, is to equate Corbyn and Stalin, which most of you have seen through for the daft idea that it is.
Nobody is going to come out and defend Stalin, least of all me, and all this post shows is Spicey's increasingly desperate means of trying to discredit the Labour Party, which hasn't worked.
Nobody is going to come out and defend Stalin, least of all me, and all this post shows is Spicey's increasingly desperate means of trying to discredit the Labour Party, which hasn't worked.
Not quite Mikey. SP wrote: "You could argue that under the current administration, with zero hour contracts, the bedroom tax, the treatment of the disabled on benefits, and the unending austerity measures...etc"
And talking about the CURRENT administration (and for that matter the Blair/Brown debacle) you can't really argue against SP.
Not saying he's not a pillock in other ways, just not in that answer!
BB
And talking about the CURRENT administration (and for that matter the Blair/Brown debacle) you can't really argue against SP.
Not saying he's not a pillock in other ways, just not in that answer!
BB