Donate SIGN UP

Answers

41 to 60 of 75rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
You started it, TTT.
Question Author
yeah tilly but half the thread has gone, must have been a right ding dong!
To summarise:

In May 2016, Nigel Farage said that he would fight for a second referendum on Britain in Europe if the remain campaign won by a narrow margin.

I don't remember anyone complaining about that on AB at the time.
A bit of foot stamping that's all.
'twas, TTT. Bow out now.
No ding dong at all.





To summarise:

In May 2016, Nigel Farage said that he would fight for a second referendum on Britain in Europe if the remain campaign won by a narrow margin.

I don't remember anyone complaining about that on AB at the time.




I don't think anyone had time to complain ... do you?
Well, not a ding dong, I agree. but...
He was in UKIP so he was bound to fight on, same as the SNP
Question Author
"In May 2016, Nigel Farage said that he would fight for a second referendum on Britain in Europe if the remain campaign won by a narrow margin" - yes but he was the leader of UKIP, he is duty bound to get us out of the EU and would have Kept on trying even if it was a much bigger win for remain, that's his raison d'etre. That's not the same as remain wanting the status quo.
-Talbot-

There was a month.

Long enough.

But the main point is - Farage was proposing a second vote if the split was 52/48 to remain.

This is exactly what's happening now, but in reverse.
TTT

It's exactly what's happening now then.

...in reverse.
Question Author
It would be valid sp if you were say the leader of the UKDP (d=dependence) and we were outside the EU and you wanted at all costs to be under the jack boot of a corrupt foreign power, then sure have another go.
In fairness, Farage has mooted a second referendum, albeit in the guise of giving a message to the Remainers, but if he were really honest, he would say:

"I know how they feel. I also said that a 52/48 split would not be the end of it. They're just campaigning in the same way I would've campaigned had it gone the other way, with the same percentages."
A month?

Shouldn't be hard to prove then ... Of you go.
Off^
TTT

It's no good. What Farage was talking about (and I agree with him - always have) is that 52/48 is too slim. He said that a two thirds / one third split would have been decisive. His issue at the time was the projected 'almost half and half' vote.

I have always said on AB that it would've been so much better if one side had one outright...really clearly.

But as Farage correct predicted 48/52 will prompt the losing side to fight on.

He would've, and now Remainers, or whatever political persuasion (both Conservative and Labour) are banding together in the same way that UKIP would've fought on.
As usual, TTT., spot on. These remoaners ain't half got their Alans in a Brahms.
TTT / -Talbot-

Was Farage wrong to suggest that a 52/48 split would mean a second referendum?

41 to 60 of 75rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Breath Taking Arrogance?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.