News25 mins ago
What's Donald Trump Said About Guns And Gun Control?
http://
Here's another example of what a wassock Trump is....he used to be against the ownership of assault weapons, but now he advocates the carrying of weapons into night clubs by everybody. Hundreds of people have been injured or killed recently in America, but he still wants to hang on to that lovely dosh that the NRA gives him and other Republicans, rather than actually do something useful.
Let ABs Trumpettes defend him now.
Here's another example of what a wassock Trump is....he used to be against the ownership of assault weapons, but now he advocates the carrying of weapons into night clubs by everybody. Hundreds of people have been injured or killed recently in America, but he still wants to hang on to that lovely dosh that the NRA gives him and other Republicans, rather than actually do something useful.
Let ABs Trumpettes defend him now.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Reducing the number of lethal weapons available to mass murderers is a good idea, yes? I've got that. (Vegas, the church and now this.)
Reducing the number of people entering the country who might be inclined to be mass murderers is probably a good idea too, isn't it? San Bernadino, Orlando? Similar point, isn't it? You do get it, don't you?
PS: did you enjoy the Met Wagner?
Reducing the number of people entering the country who might be inclined to be mass murderers is probably a good idea too, isn't it? San Bernadino, Orlando? Similar point, isn't it? You do get it, don't you?
PS: did you enjoy the Met Wagner?
It is as well to remember that Trump's brother ( I think it is his brother)is spokesman for the NRA . They did not select him for the role by chance.
Trump say the same as he always says '' The answer to gun crime is more guns, bad guys with guns must be outnumbered by good guys with guns'' A large proportion of Trump's election funding came from the NRA and associated organisations. Clinton was viewed as being more in favour of gun control so they did not want her as President.
Over on Quora I am regularly asked questions like ''How can you defend yourself against a home invasion without firearms?'' They just can't understand that in the UK we just do not have a 'gun culture' and most of us like me, never see a gun, apart from the rare occasions we see an armed police officer.
Trump say the same as he always says '' The answer to gun crime is more guns, bad guys with guns must be outnumbered by good guys with guns'' A large proportion of Trump's election funding came from the NRA and associated organisations. Clinton was viewed as being more in favour of gun control so they did not want her as President.
Over on Quora I am regularly asked questions like ''How can you defend yourself against a home invasion without firearms?'' They just can't understand that in the UK we just do not have a 'gun culture' and most of us like me, never see a gun, apart from the rare occasions we see an armed police officer.
Mikey, I’ll criticise him when criticism is due, but the material in your link has, as v_e says, been created as a propaganda pastiche, something you refuse to acknowledge. And for the record, no, I don't think it's a good idea for everybody in a crowded nightclub to be armed with a gun strapped to the waist or ankle.
Khandro....he could start by drawing up legislation that makes ownership of military assault weapons illegal. He won't do that of course, but that is what he should be doing.
The Second Amendment makes no mention of high-powered assault weapons. In the days when it was written, a gun meant a muzzle-loading flintlock. If Cruz had been using one of those, he wouldn't have been able to kill 17 people.
There is no case to be made for such military weapons being in civilian hands....the only reason that they are, is that the gun industry make eye-wateringly large amounts of money from their manufacture and sale.
The Second Amendment makes no mention of high-powered assault weapons. In the days when it was written, a gun meant a muzzle-loading flintlock. If Cruz had been using one of those, he wouldn't have been able to kill 17 people.
There is no case to be made for such military weapons being in civilian hands....the only reason that they are, is that the gun industry make eye-wateringly large amounts of money from their manufacture and sale.
Mikey, Trump will never change, he only says what his supporters want to hear.
For example on the Mexico wall. Despite indisputable evidence that the overwhelming proportion of 'illegal immigrants' actually enter the USA legally on visitor , travel or other visas, but fail to return home, he still insists his wall will stop them .
The truth is it will just be an expensive obstacle to the legitimate & lucrative travel / trade between Mexico and the USA .
For example on the Mexico wall. Despite indisputable evidence that the overwhelming proportion of 'illegal immigrants' actually enter the USA legally on visitor , travel or other visas, but fail to return home, he still insists his wall will stop them .
The truth is it will just be an expensive obstacle to the legitimate & lucrative travel / trade between Mexico and the USA .
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.