Who Needs A Legal System When You Have The Ss ?

[youngmafbog]

Yet another utterly disgraceful case.

Why are heads not rolling?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5574923/Teacher-falsely-accused-groping-students-adopted-child-removed.html

[youngmafbog]

One of the main problems is that the SS hide behind that confidentiality.

If a person is innocent then things should be returned back how they are. Not to do so means the petty gossip will always use it as a tool to 'prove' his non existent guilt.

The SS always seem willing to dive in when it is a white male but in other circumstances are very slow and indeed non existent.

[ummmm]

The school probably phoned SS.

[fiction-factory]

>The SS always seem willing to dive in when it is a white male but in other circumstances are very slow and indeed non existent.

Is that a fact?

[bednobs]

well, as i said ff as we, the public dont hear anything about 99.99999% of families ss are working with, who knows?

[EDDIE51]

Social Services can ONLY do '' What is considered to be in the Best Interest of the child'' No other decision is even possible. The only consideration is for the child /children , no one other than the child /children have any 'rights' in the case.
They operate in total secrecy , with the investigations and findings never being made public or reveled to the media. This is considered essential to the safety of the children involved. So neither we or newspapers / TV can ever know what the background to a case is.
We can not make a judgement as we can never know the full situation.

[naomi24]

// i doubt anybody wants to be "seen to be doing the right thing" as nobody, except their colleagues and the families they are working with usually see anything //

They're the people I'm talking about.

[youngmafbog]

So you are happy for them to storm in take kids on the say so (no evidence) of some vindictive person and not return them are you?

I suppose given your political leanings shown on this site you are.
Personally I am no.

[Ama16]

There must be more to this story, how could he be accused when he wasn't even there when the allegations took place, he was on adoption leave... doesn't make any sense to me.

[naomi24]

Eddie, //We can not make a judgement//

Yes, we can. When they’re wrong they’re wrong. Saying ‘We cannot make judgement’ lets them off the hook – yet again. More lessons to be learnt?

[ummmm]

Who has said they're happy?

[youngmafbog]

"how could he be accused when he wasn't even there when the allegations took place"

Under Saunders Plod were pushed to believe any accusation. Tom Watson used this to smear many Tories who also were not guilty.

At least Saunders has gone but those in the Police and SS who were also complicit in this war against men are still very much out there.

[jackthehat]

///So you are happy for them to storm in take kids on the say so (no evidence) of some vindictive person and not return them are you?///

You have no idea that this is what actually happened bar the 'even-handed' (hah!) report in the DM.

///I suppose given your political leanings shown on this site you are.
Personally I am no. ///

Why are you compelled to attach these comments to your posts? Do you believe that they undermine the credibility of the person at whom they are directed thus neutralising their views?

[youngmafbog]

Your posts certainly imply that Ummm. If that is not the case then perhaps you can correct the appearance and make it clear?

[youngmafbog]

"You have no idea that this is what actually happened bar the 'even-handed' (hah!) report in the DM"

The man is innocent and the child has not been returned. What more do you want?

"Why are you compelled to attach these comments to your posts? "

Because I want to, it's called freedom of speech based on observation. Are you ok with that?

[EDDIE51]

naomi, to make a viable judgement we would need to know the entire situation and history , that is not ever going to happen. We can only judge on what few details have been made public, and those details could be totally wrong for all we know.

[jackthehat]

///The man is innocent and the child has not been returned. What more do you want? ///

You really ought to tag ".......according to the Daily Mail" on the end there.

///Because I want to, it's called freedom of speech based on observation. Are you ok with that? ///

Of course I am. If you want to make yourself look childish......fill your boots.

[youngmafbog]

Eddie, I will ask you too. The man has been found to be falsely accused and the child removed and not returned.

What more do you want?

[youngmafbog]

"If you want to make yourself look childish"

And here comes the name calling.

[ummmm]

Social services don't storm in and take children away.

[hc4361]

Don't forget that the Family Court plays a HUGE part in the decision making process in these cases.