News0 min ago
Royal Countdown
It’s nearly time for another royal baby who’s as excited as me?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Jordyboy9. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't really care who does it (though children of wealthier countries do consume far more resources than children in poorer ones, so it would probably help if we took the lead). But there does need to be a change in cultural attitudes toward parenthood and childhood, and it needs to start somewhere... I'm not sure heaping praise and adulation on this couple for the achievement of procreating is all that desirable.
Royal Pet instead? I'd be all up for that! Let's have street parties and a national holiday with the animal's face plastered all over the realm, maybe something like this:
https:/ /i.imgu r.com/T FLLOks. jpg
https:/
Actually agree with Krom here, we need to drastically reduce the worlds population, apart from all out war or plague birth control seems the obvious.
But whilst religion is there pushing for more of their own particular ilk to be pumped out it is sadly not going to happen so war or plague it most likely will be.
But whilst religion is there pushing for more of their own particular ilk to be pumped out it is sadly not going to happen so war or plague it most likely will be.
'In his 1798 work, “An Essay on the Principles of Population,” Malthus proposes that populations are largely limited by the availability of resources, but also recognises that populations will grow as production of resources grows.
Further, populations can increase exponentially and can “out-pace” the increase of production of resources, and when this happens, the outcome is resource shortage. This can result in forced population decline (a“population crash”), or negative social outcomes, including famine, poverty, and even violent conflict. While this is a relatively simple idea, it is especially compelling, largely because it is so simple, and the results are rather obvious and predictable.'
Further, populations can increase exponentially and can “out-pace” the increase of production of resources, and when this happens, the outcome is resource shortage. This can result in forced population decline (a“population crash”), or negative social outcomes, including famine, poverty, and even violent conflict. While this is a relatively simple idea, it is especially compelling, largely because it is so simple, and the results are rather obvious and predictable.'
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --