Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
'doctor Of The Year' Quits His Job, After Being Branded Racist.
24 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-56 33131/D octor-Y ear-Lan caster- surgeon -forced -quit-r acist-a llegati ons-Asi an-coll eagues. html
Didn't he realise that there are certain sections of the community that one is not allowed to criticise?
Didn't he realise that there are certain sections of the community that one is not allowed to criticise?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
TTT
At this stage, we have only half the story, and that’s what he has presented to the tribunal.
It’s entirely possible that there is more to this story, but we will only kno what that is when he has been cross examined.
Right now, it’s like being a member of a jury and deciding that the person in dock is definitely innocent, because he’s looked us in the eye and said, “I didn’t do it.”
At this stage, we have only half the story, and that’s what he has presented to the tribunal.
It’s entirely possible that there is more to this story, but we will only kno what that is when he has been cross examined.
Right now, it’s like being a member of a jury and deciding that the person in dock is definitely innocent, because he’s looked us in the eye and said, “I didn’t do it.”
-- answer removed --
"You can be a brilliant doctor and be a bigot. The states are not mutually exclusive."
And, whisper it, you can hail from the sub-continent and be an aloof, skiving article, unable to carry out your duties properly and still be bullet proof, apparently.
We'll see, eventually. Maybe. If the horses haven't been too scared.
And, whisper it, you can hail from the sub-continent and be an aloof, skiving article, unable to carry out your duties properly and still be bullet proof, apparently.
We'll see, eventually. Maybe. If the horses haven't been too scared.
douglas9401
Undoubtably. And if the reporting process used in each case is well documented, robust and if the reports were assessed by a third party (as they surely should be), then he should be in a pretty strong position.
Take for instance the doctor accused of failing to be able to operate an ultrasound - could he or couldn’t he? If he couldn’t, was it part of his core competencies (eg. what is his speciality)?
These are pretty straightforward questions that all have binary answers. If the doctors were previously found wanting by the hospital trust, there would be documentation supporting this chap.
If not, then his case is weakened.
Undoubtably. And if the reporting process used in each case is well documented, robust and if the reports were assessed by a third party (as they surely should be), then he should be in a pretty strong position.
Take for instance the doctor accused of failing to be able to operate an ultrasound - could he or couldn’t he? If he couldn’t, was it part of his core competencies (eg. what is his speciality)?
These are pretty straightforward questions that all have binary answers. If the doctors were previously found wanting by the hospital trust, there would be documentation supporting this chap.
If not, then his case is weakened.
If he was awarded “Doctor of the Year” I rather suspect that of all the foreign staff working with him (and we know how the NHS depends heavily on foreign workers), few could have perceived him in the same way as his three accusers – in which case their competence and their agendas need to be examined thoroughly and honestly – and the treatment he’s received is quite shameful.
-- answer removed --
// just what we were talking about on the other thread. This guy dares to criticise other doctors abilities at the job, wallop, out comes the race card! //
Exactly. We all know racism is the new Witchcraft. If there's someone you want to punish or get rid of, it's usually enough to simply make the accusation whether there's any evidence of it or not*.
(*See also communism in 50s America).
Exactly. We all know racism is the new Witchcraft. If there's someone you want to punish or get rid of, it's usually enough to simply make the accusation whether there's any evidence of it or not*.
(*See also communism in 50s America).
Remember, this is just one side of the story. Right now, we’ve heard submissions from his brief. Once we hear the arguments submitted by the health authority, we will be in a better position to form an opinion.
It should be noted that the tone of the article (as presented) is set to elicit a specific response (how could we
question the professionalism of a man named ‘doctor of the year’)?
I think it behaves us to treat literally everything we’re presented with by the mainstream media as being essentially...dodgy.
It should be noted that the tone of the article (as presented) is set to elicit a specific response (how could we
question the professionalism of a man named ‘doctor of the year’)?
I think it behaves us to treat literally everything we’re presented with by the mainstream media as being essentially...dodgy.
// " after his £200,000 salary was slashed by £36,000 over unproven allegations."
Whatever happened to innocent until proved guilty? //
As I said, it's usually enough to make the allegation. Everyone involved is so petrified of being seen to side with the alleged witch/communist/racist that they go along with the mob to avoid becoming a target themselves.
That being said, sp is right. We have one side of this story, and it is in the Mail. I'm talking about the general principle of playing the racism card to attack an enemy.
Whatever happened to innocent until proved guilty? //
As I said, it's usually enough to make the allegation. Everyone involved is so petrified of being seen to side with the alleged witch/communist/racist that they go along with the mob to avoid becoming a target themselves.
That being said, sp is right. We have one side of this story, and it is in the Mail. I'm talking about the general principle of playing the racism card to attack an enemy.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.