Family Life10 mins ago
Why Are They Always In Such A Hurry To Confirm That This Sort Of Thing Isn't Believed To Be A Terror Related Incident?
126 Answers
http://
/// Superintendent Glyn Fernquest said: 'I'd like to just reassure the public that this incident is not believed to be terror related and has no links to the Newport marathon that is taking place this morning. ///
What could it possibly be, a hate crime or a racist incident or just yet another nutter?
/// Superintendent Glyn Fernquest said: 'I'd like to just reassure the public that this incident is not believed to be terror related and has no links to the Newport marathon that is taking place this morning. ///
What could it possibly be, a hate crime or a racist incident or just yet another nutter?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Actually, AOG - you’ve asked two questions.
First you asked why authorities are ‘in such a hurry’ to confirm that this sort of thing isn’t terror related.
That’s not true.
You asked whether it’s a hate crime, racist inbcide or another nutter. None of us can answer that for you. It might have been a drunk driver. It might be the second act of an event from earlier in the night, like the Gravesend nightclub attack:
https:/
First you asked why authorities are ‘in such a hurry’ to confirm that this sort of thing isn’t terror related.
That’s not true.
You asked whether it’s a hate crime, racist inbcide or another nutter. None of us can answer that for you. It might have been a drunk driver. It might be the second act of an event from earlier in the night, like the Gravesend nightclub attack:
https:/
sp1814
/// It’s to reassure the public. ///
Yes that may well be, but without definite proof, they are falsely reassuring the public.
I am not trying to say that it was a terrorist attack just questioning, why the police are in such a hurry with their assurances before they have definite proof for the reasons behind such incidents..
/// It’s to reassure the public. ///
Yes that may well be, but without definite proof, they are falsely reassuring the public.
I am not trying to say that it was a terrorist attack just questioning, why the police are in such a hurry with their assurances before they have definite proof for the reasons behind such incidents..
We had one about a fortnight ago......
http://
Most people think 'inadequate drunk bloke in a snit' when there are a given set of circumstances but given the recent 'terror-attacks' using vehicles, as soon as the Police have satisifed themselves that it is *indeed* an incident firmly attached to something that happened earlier in the same area, the seek to reassure the public.
http://
Most people think 'inadequate drunk bloke in a snit' when there are a given set of circumstances but given the recent 'terror-attacks' using vehicles, as soon as the Police have satisifed themselves that it is *indeed* an incident firmly attached to something that happened earlier in the same area, the seek to reassure the public.
sp1814
/// First you asked why authorities are ‘in such a hurry’ to confirm that this sort of thing isn’t terror related. ///
/// That’s not true. ///
I believe that it is:
In less that 4 hours, they have discovered that it wasn't a terrorist incident.
/// Injured people can then be seen lying on the floor as the car fled the scene on Cambrian Road at 5.30am. ///
/// 09:15
Police Collision Investigations Team have arrived ///
/// First you asked why authorities are ‘in such a hurry’ to confirm that this sort of thing isn’t terror related. ///
/// That’s not true. ///
I believe that it is:
In less that 4 hours, they have discovered that it wasn't a terrorist incident.
/// Injured people can then be seen lying on the floor as the car fled the scene on Cambrian Road at 5.30am. ///
/// 09:15
Police Collision Investigations Team have arrived ///
AOG
In less than four hours, the police found that the incident wasn't terror related.
That's because they're doing their job. They initiated investigations, and they have information that we don't.
For instance, the police may have discovered that the driver and one of the people mown down are known to each other...and that one had a grudge against the other.
This is how the police will establish whether an attack is terror-related.
It can be done fairly quickly. Once the basic facts of the situation are established, the police can then issue one of the following statements:
1. This is not terror related.
2. We cannot rule out a terror attack at this time.
3. This is being treated as a terrorist incident.
I think that is pretty fair, don't you?
In less than four hours, the police found that the incident wasn't terror related.
That's because they're doing their job. They initiated investigations, and they have information that we don't.
For instance, the police may have discovered that the driver and one of the people mown down are known to each other...and that one had a grudge against the other.
This is how the police will establish whether an attack is terror-related.
It can be done fairly quickly. Once the basic facts of the situation are established, the police can then issue one of the following statements:
1. This is not terror related.
2. We cannot rule out a terror attack at this time.
3. This is being treated as a terrorist incident.
I think that is pretty fair, don't you?
All this reassuring business... I don't understand where you are coming from.
Am I supposed to think 'phew, thank goodness that wasn't a terror-related incident'?
It is just as worrying that there is a growing trend for fruitloops to use their car as a weapon.
The police are not always quick to rule out terrorism.
https:/
Am I supposed to think 'phew, thank goodness that wasn't a terror-related incident'?
It is just as worrying that there is a growing trend for fruitloops to use their car as a weapon.
The police are not always quick to rule out terrorism.
https:/
/// They’ve said they don’t ‘believe’ it is. ///
Exactly that is why I asked my original question.
"Why Are They Always In Such A Hurry To Confirm That This Sort Of Thing Isn't Believed To Be A Terror Related Incident"?
It would seem that the subtle distinction is beyond your comprehension and not mine.
Exactly that is why I asked my original question.
"Why Are They Always In Such A Hurry To Confirm That This Sort Of Thing Isn't Believed To Be A Terror Related Incident"?
It would seem that the subtle distinction is beyond your comprehension and not mine.
-Talbot-
The police won’t rule out terror when they suspect a incident may be terror related, but don’t have enough evidence or witness statements to confirm one way or the other.
In the case that AOG has asked about, there was a need to reassure the public because there was a big public event planned for later in the day.
The police won’t rule out terror when they suspect a incident may be terror related, but don’t have enough evidence or witness statements to confirm one way or the other.
In the case that AOG has asked about, there was a need to reassure the public because there was a big public event planned for later in the day.
Latest Posts
Body & Soul29 mins ago
I Think I've Found P Ps True...
Society & Culture32 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles33 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.