Donate SIGN UP

Can We Now Discuss This Case?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 14:50 Tue 29th May 2018 | News
266 Answers
ABSpareEditor

I don't know if this was the story that we can't debate on, but according to the Daily Mail reporting restrictions were lifted this afternoon.


Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 266rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
How many people? I dont know. But there are 77 pages of Contempt of Court judgements on the judiciary website.

And I can think of a least one other case where the person was lifted, charged, appeared before the Judge, pleaded guilty and was sentenced (albeit not to a custodial) all in the same day. That was Yaxley-Lennon in 2017.
The judgement would have been published as soon as the jury returns its verdict in the instant case. It has to be pubished within 24 hours unless subject to a postponement order.
Yes, as they do with everyone else they banged on his door at 4:30am didn't they?
Talbot,
Choudry, Hamza, and the Yorkshire ripper did not commit Contempt of Court offences. Judges in CofC situations have very severe powers.

Robinson is not the first person to have been jailed for committing this offence.
///Yes, as they do with everyone else they banged on his door at 4:30am didn't they? ///

That's a bit of a non-sequitur. Y/L/R was out and about in public when he committed his latest offence.
So the answer to my question at the moment is nobody as far as we are aware?

Correct?
Lots of diversion and lots of avoidance atm.
// they banged on his door at 4:30am didn't they? //

Not in this case.
His previous offence in Canterbury led to an early morning call from plod. Are uou suggesting the police should wait until morning before arresting people who have committed a crime?
Anyone?
I am aware of a number of cases where people have been immediately imprisoned for CoC. But probably they are not newsworthy enough for the papers to get very excited about.
Any link?
Talbot, I don't think there is deliberate avoidance, I'm just not sure people (me, included) understand quite what you are driving at....
That something stinks about this whole affair.

Well, I managed to get that from your posts.... :o)

What do you think is going on, and why?
Nothing really stinks, SP got it at 16:42. You simply cannot do it, he is jeopardising the case being heard.
Here is the judicial website link https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/subject/contempt-of-court/

There are approximately 770 cases on there.

And it wasnt as "slam dunk" as you may think. He even thanked his supporters for raising 20k to employ a top QC who kept him out of prison last time. He knew jolly well what was happening - this is why he was able to film his arrest on the last ocassion. Nothing stinks, he has broken the law and been dealt with accordingly.
Well, I have never heard of someone being on the streets of the UK and within hours in a jail serving a sentence not on remand but serving a sentence.
Take into account the police lies and that makes me suspicious, very suspicious.
//Well, I have never heard of someone being on the streets of the UK and within hours in a jail serving a sentence not on remand but serving a sentence.//

Yeah. I see that. That seems - odd. I would like to hear how these cases are tried. It seems like it was over and done really, really quickly.
Did any of those get lifted and jailed within hours, Barmaid?
With respect, Talbot, just because you haven't heard of it happening does not mean that it never does.

What lies do you think the Police told?

41 to 60 of 266rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Can We Now Discuss This Case?

Answer Question >>