Film, Media & TV7 mins ago
Are The Authorities Really Concerned For The Safety Of The Public?
35 Answers
http://
These female terrorist should never be allowed back into this country and why are they allowed to wear burqas in court?
These female terrorist should never be allowed back into this country and why are they allowed to wear burqas in court?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
“why are they allowed to wear burqas in court? “
You can email them directly.
[email protected]
Or if you prefer you can write to them.
Old Bailey
London
EC4M 7EH
Good luck and please report back on your findings.
You can email them directly.
[email protected]
Or if you prefer you can write to them.
Old Bailey
London
EC4M 7EH
Good luck and please report back on your findings.
now I was just saying that earlier on
yes treason is a crime still
and the last one was Lord haw Haw - hanged but not regarded as a success and Churchill ordered no more be brought.
https:/
is good enough.
Treason is good enough for 1400's but not really stood the test of time.
yes treason is a crime still
and the last one was Lord haw Haw - hanged but not regarded as a success and Churchill ordered no more be brought.
https:/
is good enough.
Treason is good enough for 1400's but not really stood the test of time.
oh and the treason act and passport bit ( Lord haws Haw again) is here
https:/
glad to see no one seems to have read it since last week
am I the only to see that if you have a law like
de haeretico comburendo 1406 ( concerning the burning of heretics ) and you fink muslims dey are heretics yeah,
it may still NOT be a runner to say - oo yeah lets burn them! That is - more directly - because there is a law with a whizzie label that you like ( here: Treason) it might STILL not be easy or appropriate to use it.
[ my example is a little weakened by the fact that that the statute of 1406 has er in fact been repealed ...]
https:/
glad to see no one seems to have read it since last week
am I the only to see that if you have a law like
de haeretico comburendo 1406 ( concerning the burning of heretics ) and you fink muslims dey are heretics yeah,
it may still NOT be a runner to say - oo yeah lets burn them! That is - more directly - because there is a law with a whizzie label that you like ( here: Treason) it might STILL not be easy or appropriate to use it.
[ my example is a little weakened by the fact that that the statute of 1406 has er in fact been repealed ...]
oh god I dont know why I take this sort of thread seriously.
Treason Act er 1351 is here
https:/
it is about invading or sort of making war against the Queen of England and her successors. The courts had become a littel to liberal about chasing the killers of Edward II ( yeah the foo-foo up the hoo-hoo, that one) and an Act was needed.
Doesnt mean it works today
The difficulty as I am sure the Home and Foreign Office knows that if someone goes and fires a few shots at Pres Assad - it almost certainly isnt treason. It is something else.
( Foreign Enlistment Act - you cant join anothers army without the sovereigns permission) - clearly here they are gonna say they didnt join - they just sort of found anAK 47 and started firing it)
Treason Act er 1351 is here
https:/
it is about invading or sort of making war against the Queen of England and her successors. The courts had become a littel to liberal about chasing the killers of Edward II ( yeah the foo-foo up the hoo-hoo, that one) and an Act was needed.
Doesnt mean it works today
The difficulty as I am sure the Home and Foreign Office knows that if someone goes and fires a few shots at Pres Assad - it almost certainly isnt treason. It is something else.
( Foreign Enlistment Act - you cant join anothers army without the sovereigns permission) - clearly here they are gonna say they didnt join - they just sort of found anAK 47 and started firing it)
PeterPedant, do stop getting your knickers in a knot with your historical -or is that hysterical - delvings, there's a good chap.
//Since the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 became law, the maximum sentence for treason in the UK has been life imprisonment.//
This sounds about right.
//adhering to the sovereign's enemies, giving them aid and comfort, in the realm or elsewhere//
https:/
//Since the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 became law, the maximum sentence for treason in the UK has been life imprisonment.//
This sounds about right.
//adhering to the sovereign's enemies, giving them aid and comfort, in the realm or elsewhere//
https:/
Latest Posts
ChatterBank10 mins ago
Society & Culture16 mins ago
Body & Soul26 mins ago
Crosswords33 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.