Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Terror Watchdog Who Said We Shouldn’T Arrest Isis Fighters Is Appointed Uk’S Top Prosecutor
//Max Hill QC - once dubbed a "politically incorrect snowflake" for being soft on terror - will replace Alison Saunders as the £250,000-a-year Director of Public Prosecutions in November… Mr Hill – the boss of the UK’s terror watchdog – was slammed earlier this year after publicly urging the government not to arrest jihadi fighters returning from fighting for ISIS but instead give them "space" to get back to normal life.
As the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, he defended those who went to fight in Iraq and Syria as "naive" teenagers….. He has also courted controversy by claiming the phrase "Islamist terrorist" should not be used to describe bloodthirsty jihadi killers.//
Well, that’ll learn ‘em!
Who decides on these ridiculous appointments?
https:/ /www.th esun.co .uk/new s/68510 72/terr or-watc hdog-wh o-said- we-shou ldnt-ar rest-is is-figh ters-is -appoin ted-uks -top-pr osecuto r/
As the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, he defended those who went to fight in Iraq and Syria as "naive" teenagers….. He has also courted controversy by claiming the phrase "Islamist terrorist" should not be used to describe bloodthirsty jihadi killers.//
Well, that’ll learn ‘em!
Who decides on these ridiculous appointments?
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think your being rather bias Naomi and taking the words of one section of the press as representing him truthfully (always a dodgy basis for a sound argument).
In the past he's stated that friends and families of terrorists should be jailed for failing to alert authorities to possible attacks.
He's also said that some existing powers are underused or carry sentences that are too light to work as an effective deterrent to terrorism.
He's used section 38B of the Terrorism Act 2000 to successfully prosecute people associated with terrorism and then complained that the sentences he handed out (max 5 years) were insufficient.
let's have a balanced view, eh?
In the past he's stated that friends and families of terrorists should be jailed for failing to alert authorities to possible attacks.
He's also said that some existing powers are underused or carry sentences that are too light to work as an effective deterrent to terrorism.
He's used section 38B of the Terrorism Act 2000 to successfully prosecute people associated with terrorism and then complained that the sentences he handed out (max 5 years) were insufficient.
let's have a balanced view, eh?
Naomi, this was the main source of my points:
https:/ /www.in depende nt.co.u k/news/ uk/home -news/t erroris ts-fami lies-fr iends-s hould-b e-jaile d-faili ng-aler t-autho rities- police- max-hil l-isis- legal-a 7924941 .html
There are others if you search.
https:/
There are others if you search.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.