Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
Northamptonshire Council Going Bust
Another example of lily-livered *** not standing up to a bullying government (actually it was Thatcher and her rate-capping that started it).
I’d bet the people of Northamptonshire would gladly pay a pound or two a week extra and maintain their services, but no, the council officials kow-tow to this pernicious legislation.
Stand up!
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-engla nd-nort hampton shire-4 5030182
BB
I’d bet the people of Northamptonshire would gladly pay a pound or two a week extra and maintain their services, but no, the council officials kow-tow to this pernicious legislation.
Stand up!
https:/
BB
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bainbrig. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.VAT is a tax on consumption - and therefore quite difficult to avoid - and it's zero on food and some other 'essentials'.
The problem with loading everything onto income is that there are going to be many, many people who pay nothing (either legitimately or fraudulently) - which gives them no interest in monitoring what the money raised is used for - and every interest in grinding more and more out of a society into which they pay nothing.
The problem with loading everything onto income is that there are going to be many, many people who pay nothing (either legitimately or fraudulently) - which gives them no interest in monitoring what the money raised is used for - and every interest in grinding more and more out of a society into which they pay nothing.
If they pay nothing illegitimately then the individual needs catching, same as any criminal, and any loopholes closed. If legitimately then they must be sustaining themselves on welfare, and have an incentive to get off of it. Their voice would not be great, and they'd be unable to 'grind' anything; those in authority need to make reasonable decision regardless.
True Dave. And one advantage of the much-criticised Rates system, was that it was at least LOCAL. Paying money into central government is really too distant for most of us. Paying money into local government, where it is directly spent on local services, makes more democratic sense.
It didn't work well, pre-Thatcher's rate-capping fiasco, but it did WORK, and while there were complaints galore (remember The Ratepayers' Association?) it functioned.
It didn't work well, pre-Thatcher's rate-capping fiasco, but it did WORK, and while there were complaints galore (remember The Ratepayers' Association?) it functioned.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.