You'll have to remind me. Was it when you asked a silly question based on quoting a few words from one sentence of mine. A bit like if I said something like "I beat my wife yesterday at table tennis" you asked me why I'm a wife beater. Something silly like that .
So you accept all the other points about his criminal history but want to clarify one of several aspects to divert attention from the others?.
Can you show me he wasn't. Can you remind me why the police came round before he hit the policeman?
But it seems a distraction in regard to the OP he has quite a criminal past and is not the angel that Weston makes out.
Equally I could ask how you can be objective Talbot? You seem to believe all Weston's claims even though there is no evidence in there- at the moment it's all just a story that Tommy is spinning. If and when real evidence comes along I'll take notice of it and maybe agree with Robinson. But at the moment we don't.
Talbot - // You want to believe the worst you have heard about TR... I want to know the truth //
The truth and the worst I have heard about 'Tommy Robinson' are one and the same thing - he has a criminal record with his offences being a matter of public record.
Unless of course the police and the legal system are 'out to get him'?
Actually, that scenario does rather ring a bell. Doesn't it Mr Weston?
^ debate should have been dispute- or as theHuff Post articel (MSM fake news?) puts it "to stop a confrontation between Lennon and his partner." If you have evidence that he was defending himself from her or it was just a debate about what to have for tea then I'll look at that objectively. If I could be bothered I'd probably find a 20 minute youtube clip from a nutjob who states it and demand that you watch it, but that would be silly...wouldn't it
Character assassinations clearly delight the assassins but they don’t address the OP in any way whatsoever so I’ll repeat a question I asked earlier which remains unanswered. How is the crime relevant to the treatment an inmate can expect to receive from the authorities in prison? Even the rights of the foulest of murderers are respected so how come Tommy Robinson’s aren’t – and how come that something that fundamental is irrelevant to our fine, upstanding, oh so moral critics?
Someone dealt with earlier. Was it ickeria? As things stand, your question is based on a false premise. The only evidence is Tommy's claims which have not as yet been substantiated. His complaint to the prison authorities was dismissed