ChatterBank0 min ago
Politically Correct Nonesense Now Affecting Quiz Shows
44 Answers
I think this is completely ridiculous Quiz show to ask gender neutral questions
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/e ntertai nment-a rts-453 29067
What do others think.
https:/
What do others think.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gordiescotland1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm not quite sure why it's politically correct to want to be even handed, all male or all female teams if they are the norm for the programme are clearly not representative of your average university, what's wrong with rectifying that, or including questions which relate to or are about females as well as males?
I think that only students and staff taking/teaching so called "Mickey Mouse" courses have the time and energy to involve themselves with such nonsensical notions. Students studying subjects such as medicine, engineering, architecture, economics, etc are far to busy and involved to become interested in such stuff mainly because they are far too busy...eh...studying.
I saw a program about the selection process for UC competitors about three(?) years ago.
The university or college applies to be a competitor in the next series and then invites students to apply to be in the team. Presumably (and why would it not be of you want to win?) the process for selecting team members will be based on merit. UC then has its process for selecting the final entrants.
God knows what they were then, far less what they are now.
The university or college applies to be a competitor in the next series and then invites students to apply to be in the team. Presumably (and why would it not be of you want to win?) the process for selecting team members will be based on merit. UC then has its process for selecting the final entrants.
God knows what they were then, far less what they are now.
More utterly pathetic PC $h!te that is pervading every facet of 21st century life.
I didn’t realise that knowledge and academic achievement was the sole preserve of the male population!
How odd too given that over the last decade we’ve been told that girls are continually outdoing boys in GCSE results.
Coupled with the fact that each university instigates its own process for selecting candidates for UC it has inexplicably become the fault of the BBC, who feel the need to redress the balance.
So what should make candidates do now? Decline to put themselves forward for selection for being too clever?
Utter horlicks.
I didn’t realise that knowledge and academic achievement was the sole preserve of the male population!
How odd too given that over the last decade we’ve been told that girls are continually outdoing boys in GCSE results.
Coupled with the fact that each university instigates its own process for selecting candidates for UC it has inexplicably become the fault of the BBC, who feel the need to redress the balance.
So what should make candidates do now? Decline to put themselves forward for selection for being too clever?
Utter horlicks.
Here's an example of a "Mickey Mouse" course: https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ books/2 010/aug /19/har ry-pott er-cour se-durh am-univ ersity
The BBC seem to have missed the point as to why there are so many male contestants in the teams. It is nothing to do with the questions asked, but more to do with the fact that many young girls lack confidence in their ability. This (plus adverse comment on social media) is the main reason, as explained by one of the female contestants further down in the article. So, basically, less women apply to go on the teams in the first place.
Changing the content of the questions is not going to change this.
Changing the content of the questions is not going to change this.
The headline makes this seem rather more ridiculous than it actually is. The only point is that (a) there may as well be a few more questions about notable women in history, and (b) why should only women be the ones to set these questions?
I can't say I see the harm in part (a) in particular: aren't the best and brightest supposed to know these things anyway?
I can't say I see the harm in part (a) in particular: aren't the best and brightest supposed to know these things anyway?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.