Motoring1 min ago
Another Referendum
64 Answers
Yet more talk about a second referendum on television tonight.Do you think we will end up and have another one?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Georgiesmum. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I personally know quite a few people who voted to leave on the back of the troubles at Calais. They did not even think about the economics or logistics of leaving, as long as johnny foreigner was kept at bay at our borders. Those people, bar none, have changed their minds and have told me if there was another referendum they would vote to remain.
"When we opine in a referendum is that supposed to last forever?"
We had a referendum in 1975 on the question of whether to remain in the (then) EEC. I don't recall anyone then suggesting that it should be revisited at regular intervals. In fact the result has lasted for forty-three years (and counting) and would have lasted a lot longer than that but for Mr Farage and his mates continually striving to get us out of the undemocratic car crash that the EU has become.
The EU (and its predecessors) has not been particularly economically advantageous to the UK. In other respects it has been positively disastrous. The best it can be described as is "convenient". Convenient for politicians because many of the issues effecting the country which they should be rightly debating determining have been transferred elsewhere. Convenient for businesses because it saved them the tiresome problems associated with dealing with foreign countries which normal countries have to endure.
The price for that convenience has been mainly paid by people who gained no advantage from it and they decided they had had enough. It is foolish to suggest that the country, having decided on a different direction, should suddenly reverse its decision simply because implementing it is a bit tricky (principally caused by the UK wanting to retain many of the conveniences mentioned above and the EU's quite understandable wish to see them withdrawn unless considerable concessions are made). The decision's been made. The government needs to get on with it, bearing in mind what leaving the EU should actually mean. Maybe in forty-odd years the issue can be revisited once the new arrangements have had time to bed in.
We had a referendum in 1975 on the question of whether to remain in the (then) EEC. I don't recall anyone then suggesting that it should be revisited at regular intervals. In fact the result has lasted for forty-three years (and counting) and would have lasted a lot longer than that but for Mr Farage and his mates continually striving to get us out of the undemocratic car crash that the EU has become.
The EU (and its predecessors) has not been particularly economically advantageous to the UK. In other respects it has been positively disastrous. The best it can be described as is "convenient". Convenient for politicians because many of the issues effecting the country which they should be rightly debating determining have been transferred elsewhere. Convenient for businesses because it saved them the tiresome problems associated with dealing with foreign countries which normal countries have to endure.
The price for that convenience has been mainly paid by people who gained no advantage from it and they decided they had had enough. It is foolish to suggest that the country, having decided on a different direction, should suddenly reverse its decision simply because implementing it is a bit tricky (principally caused by the UK wanting to retain many of the conveniences mentioned above and the EU's quite understandable wish to see them withdrawn unless considerable concessions are made). The decision's been made. The government needs to get on with it, bearing in mind what leaving the EU should actually mean. Maybe in forty-odd years the issue can be revisited once the new arrangements have had time to bed in.