Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 45rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Could not agree more with the 13:13 post ...
-- answer removed --
UKIP are on the up with or without Tommy.
Lol, luckily I kept the posts from the experts who said they were finished.
Have you ever noticed that the same group of people on AB are remarkably consistent in their predictions, they're wrong about everything.
(doesn't ever shut them up though)
No ZM, you took it out of context and in the reply.

What I originally wrote was

"Much of it resonates with the man on the street"

And it does.

followed by
"The man on the street tends to be the majority." in reply

Which he is.



well he's got one box ticked, football hooliganry is de rigeur these days: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Lavery
YMB. The man on the street is not the majority. Assuming he is means you think everyone thinks the same way, which takes me back to my point that to assume such a think is sheer stupidity and is in no way a sound basis to make a debating point on.

You're much better just chipping in and agreeing with Tora than trying to go it on your own and making nonsensical comments.
YMB - // And here we go again, I am superior to thou so my view stands yours does not is what you are saying. //

No, that's not what I am saying - which is why I didn't say it.
Spicerack - // Have you ever noticed that the same group of people on AB are remarkably consistent in their predictions, they're wrong about everything.
(doesn't ever shut them up though) //

You're right, but daily robotic thoughtless groundless Islam-bashing on here is the price we all pay for free speech.
YMB - // The man on the street tends to be the majority. I take iyt from your statement you are not a fan of democracy. //

Then you take it incorrectly - again.

// Trying to link the man on the street to Hitler really crashes any credibility you had. //

With you perhaps - I think I can live with that.
So, isn't there a rule or law or theory that in most prolonged discussions somebody will eventually, in desperation, stoop to mentioning Hitler?
sanmac - // So, isn't there a rule or law or theory that in most prolonged discussions somebody will eventually, in desperation, stoop to mentioning Hitler? //

I believe there is, but I never 'stoop', and I don't do 'desperation', so I wouldn't worry about it.
andy-hughes, //daily robotic thoughtless groundless Islam-bashing //

When you demonstrate that it's groundless rather than just repeating your persistent uninformed opinions, others who can and do demonstrate that it isn't may begin to take you seriously.
Naomi - // andy-hughes, //daily robotic thoughtless groundless Islam-bashing //

When you demonstrate that it's groundless rather than just repeating your persistent uninformed opinions, others who can and do demonstrate that it isn't may begin to take you seriously. //

But they don't demonstrate that it isn't - they just bash away, day in day out - that is rather my point.

As to whether 'they take me seriously or not … ' that is the domain of the terminally paranoid on here who live their lives in meaningless fear and anguish.

I am not part of that clique, I don't care if they take me seriously or not.
//But they don't demonstrate that it isn't//

They do ... not that you notice.
Naomi - // //But they don't demonstrate that it isn't//

They do ... not that you notice. //

I could post 'Oh not they don't!' - such is your constant childish gainsaying of anything I right, but in keeping with my avowed stance of not caring, I am going to stop tit-for-tatting with you - it bores everyone else (and me!) and gets threads derailed and deleted.
If it bores you why do you do it so often?
Talbot - // If it bores you why do you do it so often? //

There's no point stopping tit-for-tatting with Naomi, just to start it up with you, is there?

If you've got something to ask me about the thread, then please feel free, this conversation avenue is now closed.
Why so often... And with so many.
Talbot - in case you missed it -

If you've got something to ask me about the thread, then please feel free, this conversation avenue is now closed.
But he is asking about the thread. Threads do, as I'm sure you've noticed, go off on tangents and different directions. This one has now taken a direction, avenue if you like, with which you are not comfortable.

21 to 40 of 45rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Would It Restore Ukip's Popularity If If Tommy Robinson Joined The Party?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.