Why Are We Letting This Slimeball Out?

[ToraToraTora]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-45911160
"Up to 25 measures to control him have been prepared, the BBC understands." - yeah? well we only need one as far as I'm concerned.

[AuntLydia]

He is being let out which means he must no longer be seen as a threat to the UK. yet they are spending 2 million pounds on Policing and following him for the next two years. You could not make it up. Oh and they are continuing giving him Benefits of more than £18,000 a year. The UK is a laughing stock.

[retrocop]

The 25 conditions of parole are totally impracticle and are not able to be strictly monitored unless he is handcuffed 24/7. For £2 million a year it would be cheaper to leave him in the nick in isolation,bread and water and throw away the key. You can bet human rights will soon be pleaded with regard to banishment from certain mosques and here we go again.

[dannyk13]

He has been let out because he has served his sentence.He is still seen as a threat hence the measures to control him.

[retrocop]

Danny

How I read it he has served half his sentence,still considered a threat, and is still released. He is a lawyer allegedly. He will be howling for his human rights and no doubt will be granted them because of what he is.

[retrocop]

Bring back DORA and quick.If we can't deport him we can bang him up for ever. That will sort it. DORA or an amended Treason Act.

[dannyk13]

Retro, if he behaved himself in prison then there was no option but to release him after serving half his sentence. Stupid, yes, but thems the rules.

[ToraToraTora]

if he's still a threat keep the bar steward banged up.

[ToraToraTora]

not true danny, if he is considered a terrorist threat then they can keep him locked up.

[anotheoldgit]

The 'If you behave you will be released early' rule should now be changed, and prisoners should serve their full sentence, and if they misbehave, then their sentence should be increased.

[jim360]

Early release is, I think, also related to problems with lack of capacity and resources. If we want to lock people up for longer then we should be prepared to build the space and pay the staff to achieve this, and apparently as a country we aren't.

[dannyk13]

TTT,He was not charged with terrorism.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/05/cleric-anjem-choudary-charged-with-encouraging-support-for-islamic-state

[anotheoldgit]

dannyk13
/// TTT,He was not charged with terrorism. ///

Well 'encouraging' terrorism then.

[dannyk13]

TTT/ AOG
Do you not think that if there was a way in which he could have been kept in gaol then the authorities would have done just that.

[gulliver1]

I can Remember not so many years ago, a woman being jailed for refusing to buy a tv licence. Yes, no wonder "the UK is a laughing stock " A/L.

[retrocop]

Danny
ISIS is a proscribed Terrorist group. Choudhary was charged with incitement to support a proscribed Terrorist organisation. That charge is under the Terrorist Act 2000 I believe.

// Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) also known as Dawlat al-'Iraq al-Islamiyya, Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and Dawlat al Islamiya fi Iraq wa al Sham (DAISh) and the Islamic State in Iraq and Sham - Proscribed June 2014 ISIL is a brutal Sunni Islamist terrorist group active in Iraq and Syria. The group adheres to a global jihadist ideology, following an extreme interpretation of Islam, which is anti-Western and promotes sectarian violence. ISIL aims to establish an Islamic State governed by Sharia law in the region and impose their rule on people using violence and extortion.
ISIL was previously proscribed as part of Al Qa’ida (AQ). However on 2 February 2014, AQ senior leadership issued a statement officially severing ties with ISIL. This prompted consideration of the case to proscribe ISIL in its own right. //

[Baldric]

@ 11:58

Link please Gulliver.

[dannyk13]

Retro, yes, I know as that was the charge mentioned in my link but I still think that the authorities hands were tied.

[Togo]

Perhaps we should send him to the Saudi consulate. He would be safe there surely.

[gulliver1]

Thats the answer then, check to see if " Slime Ball " has got a TV Licence, if not get retro to nick him, and send him back to porridge.

[retrocop]

//Thats the answer then, check to see if " Slime Ball " has got a TV Licence, if not get retro to nick him, and send him back to porridge.//

The person to whom you refer has been receiving practically every conceivable state benefit including a large house whilst in custody and out. He probably has a TV supplied by the state with licence exemption.