When you support and quote Breitbart, you are supporting Steve Bannon's aim to destroy society, and leave food and security and heathcare in the hands of the super-rich.
See the Telegraph. Not a leftie-rag in my view:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/07/steve-bannon-shares-fascists-obsession-cleansing-apocalyptic/.
What Breitbart and others are seeking, is to destroy government through disinformation, division, lies and a population that wants to believe their lies.
Once reality strikes, anyone without a great deal of wealth will be at the mercy of the guns and food rationing that the wealthy will use to control the poor schmucks who supported their agenda.
My attitude is that I despise all grooming, trafficking, raping and bombing, stabbing, machine gunning people and hope they are brought to justice through the judicial system.
You accuse people like me of moral superiority. Perhaps. My argument to that is that I do not link those crimes with the word 'Muslim'
It has become so easy for certain people to make that connection, because in the echo chambers of Facebook Groups and elsewhere, this kind of language has become accepted and normalised.
It's the same with knee-jerk comment like "Treason May". Or the "EUSSR"; or any other of the casual insults that dominate the news threads on this site and many others.
Instead of using the name in an unemotional way, people choose to use emotionally-loaded descriptors which are designed to shut down debate and trigger anger and outrage and tribalism.
If there is a reason for lack of activity on news it is (IMHO) because social media has encouraged this kind of ultra emotional polarising of positions that allow zero scope for sensible debate.