ChatterBank1 min ago
And You Thought Q.t. Couldn't Get Any Worse
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Then he would have been replaced already. But he hasn't.
It's worth bearing in min that left-wing commentators tend to view the BBC as being blatantly biased in favour of the right. No doubt this is errant nonsense, but the same is true of your own claims. The problem is slightly more perverse: the BBC tries to be politically balanced, but apparently thinks that the way to achieve this is to present every issue as evenly split own the middle. This is almost always wrong -- hence the perception of bias, when one side or another that deserves greater representation doesn't get it.
It's worth bearing in min that left-wing commentators tend to view the BBC as being blatantly biased in favour of the right. No doubt this is errant nonsense, but the same is true of your own claims. The problem is slightly more perverse: the BBC tries to be politically balanced, but apparently thinks that the way to achieve this is to present every issue as evenly split own the middle. This is almost always wrong -- hence the perception of bias, when one side or another that deserves greater representation doesn't get it.
The biggest problem with QT isn't political balance. They're still pretty even handed when it comes to presenting Labour-Tory-Third Party, which is arguably more important (not to mention easier) than representing the issue of the day right down the middle as well.
The biggest problem on QT is the behaviour of the panelists using every sentence to desperately chase for applause from the audience.
The biggest problem on QT is the behaviour of the panelists using every sentence to desperately chase for applause from the audience.