Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Peoples Vote Vs Referendum
Can anyone explain what is the difference between a "People's Vote" and a "Second Referendum"?
Everyone knows what a referendum is, why invent a new name? Do they think it will make some people vote differently?
Everyone knows what a referendum is, why invent a new name? Do they think it will make some people vote differently?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by kajman. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The title has been devised to give the impression that the referendum was not a "People's Vote".
The majority of those who voted chose to leave and Parliament endorsed that. Nothing has changed. All that has happened is that the EU has come up with a "deal" that is so dire that remaining is preferable which of course was always their intention. People who voted to leave voted to do just that, not to sign a new treaty which is equally obnoxious as membership. No more "People's Votes" are needed.
The majority of those who voted chose to leave and Parliament endorsed that. Nothing has changed. All that has happened is that the EU has come up with a "deal" that is so dire that remaining is preferable which of course was always their intention. People who voted to leave voted to do just that, not to sign a new treaty which is equally obnoxious as membership. No more "People's Votes" are needed.
Worth pointing out that Theresa May's deal was voted down mainly because all the Brexit supporting MPs voted against it. Also worth pointing out that the current deal is backed by prominent Leavers including Mordaunt, Fox, Gove, Leadsom, Barclay, etc., etc...
Remainers are exerting as much power as they can, because of course they are, but it would have counted for nothing if the Brexit camp weren't so fundamentally divided on what Brexit is even *for*.
Remainers are exerting as much power as they can, because of course they are, but it would have counted for nothing if the Brexit camp weren't so fundamentally divided on what Brexit is even *for*.
//Also worth pointing out that the current deal is backed by prominent Leavers including Mordaunt, Fox, Gove, Leadsom, Barclay, etc., etc...//
Yes, I agree, Jim: that's certainly worth pointing out. You've read the legally binding 585 page bit of the "Deal", haven't you? Or some/most of it. Do you have an explanation for the "prominent Leavers"' change of mind?
Yes, I agree, Jim: that's certainly worth pointing out. You've read the legally binding 585 page bit of the "Deal", haven't you? Or some/most of it. Do you have an explanation for the "prominent Leavers"' change of mind?
It is, as advised, a branding exercise.
It sounds far more inclusive, chummy even, if YOU get a 'people's vote'.
Of course, it does fly in the face of the simple fact that the original referendum was 'The People's Vote' - and the People voted.
Simply trying to re-run a democratic vote because you don't like the way the vote went, is to fly in the face of the basic principles of democracy.
It sounds far more inclusive, chummy even, if YOU get a 'people's vote'.
Of course, it does fly in the face of the simple fact that the original referendum was 'The People's Vote' - and the People voted.
Simply trying to re-run a democratic vote because you don't like the way the vote went, is to fly in the face of the basic principles of democracy.