Tommy Robinson Exposes Bbc Far Left Bias

[Khandro]

Who will be first to 'dismiss' this because it's on Breitbart?

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/02/24/tommy-robinsons-panodrama-exposes-the-bbcs-left-bias/#

from where will you gain the facts if not there and on social media ?

[TheChair]

I'll happily dismiss it - not because it's on Brietbart, but because it doesn't contain any evidence at all; just a bunch of wild claims and allegations.

[LadyCG]

Robinson is a much maligned man.

[LadyCG]

I'd sooner place my faith in Breitbart than the Beeb.

[Rockrose]

Robinson is a nasty piece of work.
his real name (and the name that he has multiple convictions under) Stephen Yaxley-Lennon sounds too ‘posh’ for his ‘man of the people’ persona? Note also that he has more than one alias, being aka as Andrew McMaster and Paul Harris, the former being the name on the passport he illegally tried to enter the US with.
Nothing more than a thug

[Khandro]

Rockrose; a well argued point! - I never thought of that; because he uses an alias (actually to protect his wife and children from abuse) he must be a thug ?? Not unlike most people in show business who use them.

[Spicerack]

Yes, RR. And he exposed the Muslim rape gangs. And he's working class. How awful.

[sunny-dave]

He didn't 'expose the muslim rape gangs' - he actually jeopardised their trial and damn nearly let them get off scot free.

The BBC does have some bias - perhaps a bit left-leaning - but is essentially still 'straight' and a useful counterbalance to the huge array of right-leaning mainstream media in the UK.

Breitbart is a ridiculous joke - stuffed with fakery, unfounded assertions masquerading as 'news' and deliberate politically motivated misinformation.

[retrocop]

Lol spicey
A well rehearsed late Mikey script if ever I heard one

[anotheoldgit]

If you want Far-Left bias try listening to the majority of talk show hosts on LBC.

[Rockrose]

//he exposed the Muslim rape gangs//
Lol best propaganda for Tommy ever - really wrong but funny nonetheless!
Because of his fame seeking he jeapordised the trials!

[Spicerack]

sunny-dave// He didn't 'expose the muslim rape gangs'//

He did, and I've got proof. Why are you making statements about things you obviously know nothing about?

[sunny-dave]

He used existing investigations as a means of self-publicity - then nearly crashed the trial.

If that's 'exposed' then you're right ...

[Spicerack]

Have you heard of Andrew Norfolk, RR? Guess not. It's just a stream of consciousness with you, isn't it?

[Kromovaracun]

//If you want Far-Left bias try listening to the majority of talk show hosts on LBC.//

Nick Ferrari is far left? Or Nigel Farage? Or Iain Dale? Or Matthew Stadlen?

These people are hardly left-wing by any sensible definition of the word.

[Spicerack]

TR and the EDL were protesting because there were no investigations.

[retrocop]

Kromovacurum
I was bemused by that reply also. However my elder son also thought Nick Ferrari was left wing and I thought he had confused him with someone else.

[retrocop]

sorry typo..... Kromovaracun

[Khandro]

The first attempt by the BNP to use the democratic process to get these issues addressed was blocked at every point, with the BBC even funding covert reporters to infiltrate the BNP and publicise what the BNP was saying in member-only meetings (the BBC made no attempt to infiltrate the mosques to see the grooming gangs pimping their schoolgirl victims). The joint actions by the far Left, Muslim organisations, the liberal establishment and the media to prevent the BNP from using democratic process to address the problem of Muslim gangs raping schoolgirls showed how little democracy there is in Britain. By 2009 the English Defence League took to the streets protesting about this scandal. Without the campaign by the EDL, there is no indication that the liberal establishment would have addressed this scandal.

[cassa333]

I’ve not actually read anything he’s written or heard anything he’s said.

MSM for years has painted him as a far right thug and a convicted criminal to boot.

Does that make it true? Only if there is proper evidence and not the ‘its Widely reported in the media so must be true’

In his particular case I have two pretty opposing views on him. On the one hand I simply don’t think he will amount to much more than he already is. I think UKIP will try to utilise his ‘man of the working class’ persona with a large (?) following to get votes that defected when NF left and he joined.

On the other he will gain traction because he is articulate and will be able to blur enough peoples thoughts to get somewhere. I also think UKIP will at some point have him standing in a by-election somewhere and he will become main streem.

I’ve been watching the bias on MSM for a while now and don’t tend to believe just whatever is put out there. Where it is true we tend to gather round the news sources that generally agree with our standpoint (on any particular issue) but do believe we should in all watch and read opposing views. If you don’t you can’t make an informed decision.

[ichkeria]

Lol: Soros-funded blah blah blah ...

A reminder that the far right hasn’t given surrendered the anti-Semitic ground entirely to Jezza and co.

Sad news about Peter Framptom tho: all that hair gone ...