Referring to convicted sex offender Adam Johnson possible return to top class football, Sky Sport's Gordon Strachan, asked this.
/// 'If he goes on to the pitch and people start calling him names, have we got to do the same as it is to the racist situation? Is it all right to call him names now after doing his three years - have we got to allow that to happen?' ///
I may be proven wrong but the chances of AJ making a comeback to 'top class' football are extremely small. Nothing to stop it being a topic for discussion on SKY but broaching the subject at all was inviting trouble and embarrassment all round. Strachan is a victim of circumstances.He gave a valid view which revolves around abuse in general towards a player(s)...
That doesn't excuse it at all though. Maybe at one time, his job would have been purely about the football. Nowadays, it is also about public perception and popularity, which they are generally happy to make use of. I am surprised he has had no PR training at all , when it is difficult nowadays to keep anything "private".
Zacs,I was simply making a point that if he had not been in the public eye he would not have had the glittering career that he had and given so much entertainment and pleasure to so many people.
That should be his epitaph,not for an analogy that some find dubious.
//to correlate being called names as a sex offender or being called names for being black... is crass and den//
That depends on the nature of the sexual offence, doesn't it, Pixie?
Adam Johnson was convicted on one count of "grooming" and one count of having sex with an under-age, namely fifteeen year old, girl. When did the police (or anybody on here) start worrying about that?
Black football players are guilty of nothing. You cannot compare the treatment of a convicted felon to someone who gets abuse because of their ethnicity.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.