ChatterBank0 min ago
Free Licence Fee For All Over 75's Scrapped
144 Answers
Answers
"lucky enough to be on benefits"... .I class myself fortunate enough to have my own money to pay my own way and NOT to require benefits.
15:22 Mon 10th Jun 2019
"There will always be losers"
Not really. Scrap the licence altogether, save the collection/policing costs. If the country sees the BBC as an asset then the nation can fund it out of existing taxation. If it's not seen as something worth funding then let the BBC either fold, or fund itself through either subscription, donation, sponsorship or advertising. Win/win.
Not really. Scrap the licence altogether, save the collection/policing costs. If the country sees the BBC as an asset then the nation can fund it out of existing taxation. If it's not seen as something worth funding then let the BBC either fold, or fund itself through either subscription, donation, sponsorship or advertising. Win/win.
jno I think we are at cross purposes. What I mean is not pay and don't watch anything you need a licence to watch. Of course 3.8m people won't do that but I can dream can't I?
It is what I am seriously thinking of doing. If we hadn't been given the free licence in the first place I don't think I would be so annoyed.
It is what I am seriously thinking of doing. If we hadn't been given the free licence in the first place I don't think I would be so annoyed.
The BBC could perhaps explain why the budget for the new Eastenders set has exceeded the original cost by 27 million and the new set, which is for one programme only will now cost at least 86 million by the time it's completed. Or justify the one billion spent on a new wing to broadcasting house in London.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.