News0 min ago
Was Jim Davidson Being Racist Towards Sadiq Khan?
124 Answers
https:/
Whilst one Left-Wing comedian can suggests the throwing of acid instead of milkshakes.
Woe betide a Right-Wing comedian if he dares to state that the present Mayor of London has 'f***** up' his home town.
Yes out comes their Race Card once again, where is the racism in that?
Whilst one Left-Wing comedian can suggests the throwing of acid instead of milkshakes.
Woe betide a Right-Wing comedian if he dares to state that the present Mayor of London has 'f***** up' his home town.
Yes out comes their Race Card once again, where is the racism in that?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
baza; //I do however miss the scanty clad adverts on the underground.//
(My post at 10:53)
Not far from the National Gallery runs the London Underground stations of Charring Cross and Leicester Square, Sadiq Khan having removed the bikini clad posters, would, given free reign, no doubt liked to remove Velasquez's Venus and all the other nude pictures and have them burnt in Trafalgar Square to stop them corrupting Muslim sensibilities.
(My post at 10:53)
Not far from the National Gallery runs the London Underground stations of Charring Cross and Leicester Square, Sadiq Khan having removed the bikini clad posters, would, given free reign, no doubt liked to remove Velasquez's Venus and all the other nude pictures and have them burnt in Trafalgar Square to stop them corrupting Muslim sensibilities.
Certainly, I was premature in thinking everyone had read about it at the time.
https:/
https:/
//Certainly, I was premature in thinking everyone had read about it at the time. //
Reading what apologists said either now or at the time has nothing to do with the real motivation behind his action. It was a cowardly attempt to activate Sharia principles in London under the pretence that
it was purely on the agenda of feminism.
Reading what apologists said either now or at the time has nothing to do with the real motivation behind his action. It was a cowardly attempt to activate Sharia principles in London under the pretence that
it was purely on the agenda of feminism.
Khandro - // //Certainly, I was premature in thinking everyone had read about it at the time. //
Reading what apologists said either now or at the time has nothing to do with the real motivation behind his action. It was a cowardly attempt to activate Sharia principles in London under the pretence that
it was purely on the agenda of feminism. //
Interesting - you ask Mamya what, in her opinion was the reason, and then state your own opinion as though it is a fact.
It is only your opinion, and not provable by you or anyone else.
Reading what apologists said either now or at the time has nothing to do with the real motivation behind his action. It was a cowardly attempt to activate Sharia principles in London under the pretence that
it was purely on the agenda of feminism. //
Interesting - you ask Mamya what, in her opinion was the reason, and then state your own opinion as though it is a fact.
It is only your opinion, and not provable by you or anyone else.
Naomi - // That was done for the purpose of sending an immediate message to the Muslim community confirming the whereabouts of Khan’s loyalties … in my opinion. //
Since, by his own admission, Mr Khan is not a practising Muslim, why would he be interested in courting their favour, and in view of his absence of faith, why would they be interested in giving it?
Since, by his own admission, Mr Khan is not a practising Muslim, why would he be interested in courting their favour, and in view of his absence of faith, why would they be interested in giving it?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.