Oh Dear, Sour Grapes From The S N P......

[ToraToraTora]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-48664373

[spathiphyllum]

Naomi, there are many points in that article. I'm dismissing the one regarding Farage being given potential charges according to O’Connell.

My points from the start of this thread have been about Cottrell. The article i provided goes in depth about Cottrell and Banks.

So maybe, i'm providing the article to prove my points baout those, and not something i've not even mentioned?

Cmon lets have decent discussion about Farage, and not some petty debate about technicalities.

[spathiphyllum]

"Dare I mention it, Tommy Robinson..."

I'm out. Have a good one guys < 3

[naomi24]

spath, talk to someone else if you want to speculate.

[agchristie]

Funny how the theme of the thread is about making assumptions without foundation leaving one hoist with their own petard....

[spathiphyllum]

Here... I'll give you some info. But i'm not discussing anything with you two if you continue to come from the position towards me that you are.

Maybe re-read the thread to try understand what my focal point is, and what i'm talking about.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48516348

Naomi, you said to me -

" You’ve posted a link in support of your opinion telling us 'there's no smoke without fire' "

However, you spoke on the charges allegations. They were not part of my opinion at all.

[naomi24]

Spath, If one quite important bit of the article is, in your opinion, untrue, which bits do you want us to assume are true – and how have you selected them?

//But i'm not discussing anything with you two if you continue to come from the position towards me that you are.//

Which position would that be? Disagreeing with you?

[spathiphyllum]

The fact someone was arrested and for what charges is undeniable.

[spathiphyllum]

And the fact that they funded the brexit party, is also undeniable. Farage admitted it also. So i mean.. i don't know where you think i'm coming from. Maybe read the information that i've read?

The part i dismissed said farage "Could" face charges. Could... He didn't. But, he did refuse to go to "kangaroo court". Bit odd.

[spathiphyllum]

"Which position would that be? Disagreeing with you?
"

No, the position where you make moot points and comments that don't relate to the thread at all, but more deter anyone from wanting to join in the discussion. Bringing tommy robinson and Corbyn into the thread was pointless. Attacking me over a position i never took is also pointless.

It's clear i'm talking about those who funded the brexit party, as the thread is about money laundering.

Ironically two people who openly admitted to funding the brexit party, have faced prison time for money laundering, fraud and other financial crimes.

These people funded farage, and he refused to explain where they got the money. Saying.. it's a "kangaroo court"

Speculation? Yeah, maybe. However it's very much justified.

[naomi24]

Spath, I introduced neither Corby nor Tommy Robinson to the thread – and no one has attacked you. They’ve disagreed with you.

In my opinion, Farage has so many enemies that should anything untoward have taken place there’s a very good chance it would have been discovered.

[gulliver1]

09.43 Tell that to Boris.

[agchristie]

//Bringing tommy robinson and Corbyn into the thread was pointless.//

I disagree in that I used JC as a prime example to support your earlier statement.

Similarly, I mentioned TR because Farage was highly critical of the current UKIP leader employing his services and is not someone whose company he would choose to keep.

Farage is a very high profile public figure who encounters a high rate of people across Europe.

Now, if you are talking about his role in Brussels, I would agree, he is in the company of some very shady individuals...

[spathiphyllum]

"They’ve disagreed with you. "

Where has anyone actually disagreed with the points i'm making regarding Aaron or George?

[naomi24]

When you were speculating.

[spathiphyllum]

Rubbish. You've not commented on George or Aaron at all.

[naomi24]

That's because I have nothing to say about them.

[douglas9401]

"I'm out"

Seems an overstatement at best, unless I've mistaken the context and it's an de-closeting announcement. :-)

[spathiphyllum]

OK, so where has anyone disagree'd with me regarding George or Aaron?

[naomi24]

spath you're meeting yourself coming back again. You've provided a questionable article and you're speculating. There's nothing more to be said about it - at least on my part.

[spathiphyllum]

Naomi, at least i'm contributing to the thread. All you're trying to do is discredit my information. At least i'm bringing something to the table.

You said people were disagreeing with me, you were wrong.

Sometimes it's best to admit it and move on.