// ^^^^ it is called "inquiring minds."//
in cases of doubt - the first pathologist MIGHT call a second pathologist, who kinda does the bits that havent been done ( snip this sample that etc )
and if there are other parties wanting to dissect, then call a conference with every pathologist of every colour involved, and conduct a unified meeting where at the end everyone agrees what was there and what wasnt .... - and no one leaves the room until a unified document is agreed upon.....
I thought secondary haemorrhage due to starvation was a good one - but you know there should be clear pathological signs of that - and bleeding post mortem is easy identified.