Home & Garden4 mins ago
Boris Calls Cameron A * Girls Swot*
But that was when Cameron was PM yet it comes to light now when the court established it was not unlawful for him to suspend Parliament,
I could think of plenty things to call David Cameron who cut and run that started the mess we are now in,girly swot isn't one of them
I could think of plenty things to call David Cameron who cut and run that started the mess we are now in,girly swot isn't one of them
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.being a girlie swot myself - A levels at 16 - but I didnt go 'up' as I thought I was too young
I was thinking along the same road as retro - but in a less butch and more girlie way - - - and wondered if Boris would be . was gonna be the Last Etonian prime minister
OK for a latin quote but cant really run a country....
I was thinking along the same road as retro - but in a less butch and more girlie way - - - and wondered if Boris would be . was gonna be the Last Etonian prime minister
OK for a latin quote but cant really run a country....
-- answer removed --
Name calling is par for the course. How many times have you called your boss or a coworker a nob or some other salty name? But it is only now in the public domain for political mileage.
It doesn’t matter which party it comes from, this sort of hit job is not good.
And tbh if all they can find is this or similar then they haven’t got a huge amount of mileage and will stutter to a grinding halt pretty soon.
It doesn’t matter which party it comes from, this sort of hit job is not good.
And tbh if all they can find is this or similar then they haven’t got a huge amount of mileage and will stutter to a grinding halt pretty soon.
I suppose it was almost inevitable that people who support Johnson would excuse or explain away this, but it still doesn't come across well. Also this was an official document, commented on during an official decision, from the guy who's leader of the country. What's the problem with thinking that maybe, just maybe, the person in charge of the country should, you know, have a bit of decency and good manners for a change?
I mean, that's why I added "for a change", no? I don't think we should set perfect standards for anyone, that's impossible to achieve, but there's still something fairly pathetic about one PM describing his predecessor-but-one in such terms, on an official document -- and there's something perverse about a world where there's more pushback over calling for better decorum from a PM than there is about his use of childish insults.
It's low on my list of things to care about too, to be fair, but it's still frustrating, if you like, to see it somehow dismissed as banter. At least roll your eyes at how infantile it is.
Dwarfed in significance anyway by the idea that Parliament sitting in September at all is dismissed as a "rigmarole".
Dwarfed in significance anyway by the idea that Parliament sitting in September at all is dismissed as a "rigmarole".
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.