Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
More 'transgender' Nonsense?
I hate to break it to you 'Mr' McConnell, but men cannot give birth. They just can't. And no amount of legislation or reassignment surgery will EVER change that basic fact. What has, in fact happened, is a woman masquerading as a man has given birth. Women give birth and men do not, because they cannot.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-7 614547/ Transge nder-ma n-gave- birth-d oes-not -want-c alled-m other-c ontinue -legal- fight.h tml
Am I alone in thinking this is nuts?
Monty Python were truly prophetic in their sketch!
https:/
Am I alone in thinking this is nuts?
Monty Python were truly prophetic in their sketch!
Answers
The nonsense begins here: //He was able to get pregnant but was legally a man when the child was born.// It was perpetuated when “his” brief said she was disappointed with the original ruling (when Sir Andrew MacFarlane ruled that people who give birth are mothers, regardless of their gender). It was continued when a High Court judge ruled that he had an...
21:26 Fri 25th Oct 2019
Yes - but my God-daughter (a lovely person who has been much troubled) has just changed her name to a male equivalent and that makes no odds. But there are no children or partners involved.
Men cannot give birth - fact. It does matter, very much, to the child. We need a new form of language, I think. The child could be very confused.
Men cannot give birth - fact. It does matter, very much, to the child. We need a new form of language, I think. The child could be very confused.
"What does it matter to you or anyone else unconnected to the family. The child will know the parent as their father whatever they're registered as."
Because when I see an absurdity, I think its fair to call the absurdity out, otherwise the achingly right-on will try to browbeat people with a realistic grasp on normality into thinking it's normal. And it isn't.
Because when I see an absurdity, I think its fair to call the absurdity out, otherwise the achingly right-on will try to browbeat people with a realistic grasp on normality into thinking it's normal. And it isn't.
-- answer removed --
I sort of agree with ummm, he (let's indulge the absurdity and call her him for the purposes if this answer) may turn out to be a great 'father', and I hope 'he' is, but it doesn't avoid the undeniable fact that 'he' is in fact a woman because 'he' has given birth to a child. If 'he' was a man 'he' wouldn't have given birth. Not unless 'he' is the first 'man' in history to have been able defy biology.
Mental
Mental