ChatterBank14 mins ago
She Should Have Been Given A Parachute ...
Then arrested, what a total tool !
https:/ /www.mi rror.co .uk/new s/uk-ne ws/drun k-woman -20-fou r-hour- 2122899 6
https:/
Answers
Your quite right people do have rights and one of those rights is not to have a drunken woman roaming up and down the aisle demanding more wine and random sex wherever available. Insulting behaviour as well. The airline should have landed at the nearest airport had her offloaded, cancelled her air ticket and told her to make her own way home. They should then...
15:40 Wed 08th Jan 2020
I never defended drug dealers, I tried to pain a picture in your mind of why they may deal drugs, but as you're someone who can't understand how someones life path could be any different from yours i'm not surprised you associated me with them. Anyone who isn't on your level should be subject to your superior judgement? hehe, you crack me up my old china.
//Regarding the manhandling from randomers on the flight.. That strips the lady of her "Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment". It is also punishment without law.//
You do talk a load of twaddle sometimes, TD. At the very worst it’s assault which would probably be successfully defended under the “self defence” provision. If you are going to get involved in the HR Act you need to understand that individuals are not subject to its provisions
//NJ, if you read the article, the airline decided not to serve her anymore,…//
I have read the article. It wasn’t the article I was commenting on. It was this:
//They should have just served her more drink. She would have been satisfied and fell asleep from intoxication which was the desire.//
And this:
//Worse case scenario is she died from alcohol poisoning and that still wouldn't reflect onto the airline.//
Items of more twaddle which both came from you.
You do talk a load of twaddle sometimes, TD. At the very worst it’s assault which would probably be successfully defended under the “self defence” provision. If you are going to get involved in the HR Act you need to understand that individuals are not subject to its provisions
//NJ, if you read the article, the airline decided not to serve her anymore,…//
I have read the article. It wasn’t the article I was commenting on. It was this:
//They should have just served her more drink. She would have been satisfied and fell asleep from intoxication which was the desire.//
And this:
//Worse case scenario is she died from alcohol poisoning and that still wouldn't reflect onto the airline.//
Items of more twaddle which both came from you.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.