Society & Culture1 min ago
Too Much Time On Their Hands (Part 97)
44 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/a v/stori es-5111 3371/su bmittin g-to-my -husban d-like- it-s-19 59-why- i-becam e-a-tra dwife
Why does this woman think that her lifestyle is so wonderful that she has to film it and share it with the world?
If it suits her, fine, but honestly, who else cares???????
Why does this woman think that her lifestyle is so wonderful that she has to film it and share it with the world?
If it suits her, fine, but honestly, who else cares???????
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by andy-hughes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I suppose In should add that I do respect my OH or else we wouldn't be married, it's the submit bit that she's got all wrong, we share everything here from household chores like ironing to making meals, it's a 50/50 partnership and no man sould be treat as if the woman is pandering to his every need, likewise the reverse
She is living in a 1950's sit com - which was never the real thing anyway. Taking away the domestic violence issues ( which are still prevalent today in these 'liberated' times) there were plenty of strong women that ran 1950's households and really did not submit to their husbands. Married Working Class women were given housekeeping money and basically had a very important job of making that stretch while the man went out and did the hard graft. Middle classes had the arduous job of keeping the maids busy and persuading their husbands they really did need that new dress. Obviously there were inequalities in the work place, but the OP is about 'stay at home Traditional Wives' and I think if there were more of those our children would have a better upbringing.
//As she says, it's all about choices.
No one should be coerced into a lifestyle they don't want, decide within your partnership/marriage - even that may change along the way as circumstances alter. //
Exactly. Running a household is a fine occupation. The only issue with it is that you are financially dependent on your spouse, and therefore potentially trapped in a situation you can't easily get out of should you need to.
If it weren't for that lack of independence I'd have happily done it myself rather than commute to my dreary office job all these years and have to attend endless stupid meetings.
If you are forced to do it when you'd rather be working for someone else though, that's a whole different question.
No one should be coerced into a lifestyle they don't want, decide within your partnership/marriage - even that may change along the way as circumstances alter. //
Exactly. Running a household is a fine occupation. The only issue with it is that you are financially dependent on your spouse, and therefore potentially trapped in a situation you can't easily get out of should you need to.
If it weren't for that lack of independence I'd have happily done it myself rather than commute to my dreary office job all these years and have to attend endless stupid meetings.
If you are forced to do it when you'd rather be working for someone else though, that's a whole different question.
Ludwig, many traditional stay at home wives had 'pin money' jobs from home -and I bet they rarely bought pins with the money ;-). There was no stigma/pressure to go out to work in those days -indeed the pressure was to stay at home and look after the children, which in my opinion, is one of the most important jobs in life. …...and much harder than going out to work and bunging them into childcare.