//"Is this out of the educational budget?" No, the supplies are provided free.//
Really? Which benevolent manufacturer of these goods is dishing them out free of charge? Of course they are not “free”. They may be free of charge to those who use them, but they are not free.
//The way some people are quibbling about it, you’d swear they’d been asked to pay for the scheme.//
They are being asked to pay for it (well those of us that pay tax are). As above, they are not free. Whatever budget the cash comes from ultimately it comes from the taxpayer.
//As a start they should be tax free.//
That is a different argument to providing them free of charge but they are not free of VAT because the EU tax laws do not allow it.
Frankly this scheme is preposterous. Parents receive child benefit to help support their children but even without that, the responsibility is that of parents to provide their children with necessities. To suggest that they cannot afford to provide these items when, as explained, they are quite inexpensive, when those same parents roam around with expensive phones clamped in their hands, with tattoos and piercings aplenty and when they pay other people to make them a cup of coffee is frankly insulting to the intelligence.