Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
More "benefits" Of Tory Government
Yet another death by DWP, thank you IDS.
https:/ /www.di sabilit ynewsse rvice.c om/the- death-o f-errol -graham -man-st arved-t o-death -after- dwp-wro ngly-st opped-h is-bene fits/?f bclid=I wAR0l-w 9-F4-v5 kIvLsIn O_yV5AY CjzKjSX RJbrkvT GlVXBpa 5a_8dtN AL4c
Life's great under the Tories - NOT.
https:/
Life's great under the Tories - NOT.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
It would appear the 'so called' family also carry a great deal of responsibility for his circumstances. The deceased obviously was vunerable with mental issues. Where was he when tghe two visits were unsuccessful? Why did the family assist with the paperwork required.
Why didn't the family get food for him by personal donation or from a food bank on his behalf.Did the family contact Social Services and tell them their father/in law was vulnerable and starving.
Easy to bash the government but it looks like there is more to this situation that could be partly alleviated by family care.imo
Why didn't the family get food for him by personal donation or from a food bank on his behalf.Did the family contact Social Services and tell them their father/in law was vulnerable and starving.
Easy to bash the government but it looks like there is more to this situation that could be partly alleviated by family care.imo
//If it was wrongly stopped isn't the issue with the local council rather than anyone at Westminster ?//
Indeed. I find it rather childish to lay the blame for isolated procedural errors to be laid at the door of politicians. The benefits system provided for Mr Graham to be paid benefits. A procedural error by his local DWP meant he was not paid. How that can be laid at the door of any individual politician is a puzzle to me. Was IDS (or any other Tory politician) meant to regularly check on every individual benefit recipient to make sure they had received their entitlements? No, I thought not, which makes your post inane.
Indeed. I find it rather childish to lay the blame for isolated procedural errors to be laid at the door of politicians. The benefits system provided for Mr Graham to be paid benefits. A procedural error by his local DWP meant he was not paid. How that can be laid at the door of any individual politician is a puzzle to me. Was IDS (or any other Tory politician) meant to regularly check on every individual benefit recipient to make sure they had received their entitlements? No, I thought not, which makes your post inane.
Seems to me that his poor begger was abandoned by just about everybody. Friends, family and the state. It does strike me though, that someone who would starve in such a way, rather than seek help through charity, even hospital given his condition, shouldn't have been alone in the first place.
I gotta ask, since when has Zacs been a Tory? He's been antagonising the usual suspects throughout Brexit. Are you diversifying a little ZM? :-D
I gotta ask, since when has Zacs been a Tory? He's been antagonising the usual suspects throughout Brexit. Are you diversifying a little ZM? :-D