ChatterBank0 min ago
Breaking News , Terrorist Related In South London
Answers
Sicerack //There are 40,000 of these creatures on Jihad watch and it takes 20+ officers to watch one of them.// The idea that in order to protect society (the first duty of any government) we have to have more & more police surveillance of potential Jihadis is misguided 'top-down' thinking. We have to attack the root causes. These attacks have a religious...
08:25 Mon 03rd Feb 2020
Bobbisox - // … but feel I must say something here on you AH ,a moderator puttIng Naomi down as you have in the last 3 of your quite vitriolic posts about her, shameful //
I have explained to the point of exhaustion that being a Moderator does not preclude me from entering any thread and posting as I see fit.
It also does not exclude me from Site Rules, and if you, or Naomi, or anyone else, thinks my posts are inappropriate, you have the right of Report.
Naomi is perfectly capable of fighting her own battles, and I stand by my posts, as she does with hers.
I have explained to the point of exhaustion that being a Moderator does not preclude me from entering any thread and posting as I see fit.
It also does not exclude me from Site Rules, and if you, or Naomi, or anyone else, thinks my posts are inappropriate, you have the right of Report.
Naomi is perfectly capable of fighting her own battles, and I stand by my posts, as she does with hers.
Bobbisox - // Thank you Pixie , I will listen and watch but felt AH has gone to far ,although his argument back will be
Poster 1st
Moderator 2nd no doubt but I shan’t be answering him as I don’t wish to get into a slanging match with him //
It's not 'my argument' - it's a statement of fact, and if you prefer not to answer me, that's fine, but of course I am free to answer you.
BTW, I do exchanges of views and opinions, with varying degrees of bluntness depending whom I am addressing and how they address me in return.
I do not, however do 'slanging matches'.
Poster 1st
Moderator 2nd no doubt but I shan’t be answering him as I don’t wish to get into a slanging match with him //
It's not 'my argument' - it's a statement of fact, and if you prefer not to answer me, that's fine, but of course I am free to answer you.
BTW, I do exchanges of views and opinions, with varying degrees of bluntness depending whom I am addressing and how they address me in return.
I do not, however do 'slanging matches'.
sanmac - // It's amazing how many threads get closed, or just become non-interesting, once the resident ah gets on board. //
Interest is in the eye of the beholder, and deciding to close a thread is in the eyes of the Moderators and Editorial Team.
If threads were closed because views are frankly expressed, then the threads to which you contribute would be under serious threat!
Interest is in the eye of the beholder, and deciding to close a thread is in the eyes of the Moderators and Editorial Team.
If threads were closed because views are frankly expressed, then the threads to which you contribute would be under serious threat!
Bobbi - // Pixie I found it very interesting both yours and Naomi's input .....till of late
Shame but there it is //
I find everyone's input interesting from start to finish - I don't shy away because views are expressed robustly to those who are more than capable of answering back in a similar manner.
Shame but there it is //
I find everyone's input interesting from start to finish - I don't shy away because views are expressed robustly to those who are more than capable of answering back in a similar manner.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.