News0 min ago
Already The Luvvie Lawyers Are Throwing Their Hands Up In The Air
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-51365 970
BJ wants emergency measures to stop early release of Terrorists ( just as he said he would)
BJ wants emergency measures to stop early release of Terrorists ( just as he said he would)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bobbisox1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't see it that way, Bobbisox. My interpretation of your link is that learned people in the legal profession are warning the Government to make sure that all changes are within the law. And that's just what our Government must do before rushing into introducing new legislation that can be challenged time and time again in the courts.
It's good to be careful, but I don't see expectation as a basis for denying disappointment. If sentenced to x years then x years should be the expectation, less a bonus. Dissatisfaction in prisons regarding the change simply has to be managed. It's not like one is retrospectively increasing the sentence. Just ensuring it's complied with.
And new legislation should override old.
And new legislation should override old.
"The decision to lengthen the sentences of people who've already been sentenced and therefore expected to be serving half the sentence may be in breach of the law....: said such a reform "should be the subject of careful consideration to ensure that it complies with the rule of law"...: that under the government's plans, terror offenders will only be considered for release once they have served two-thirds of their sentence and with the approval of the Parole Board."
blah, blah, IF it suits us, hypocrisy blah
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-49689 167
blah, blah, IF it suits us, hypocrisy blah
https:/
To be honest the league system of sentencing has needed an overhaul for a long time.
Liberalisation of the judiciary and fewer and more expensive prison spaces has contributed to it.
Be good and you get out early, shorter or no sentences for ‘low level entry level’ crimes, low value crimes not even investigated, life doesn’t mean life it just means your life sentence tags along not that you will be in prison for life.
It’s all a contribution but TBH we simply don’t have the resources to bang up for an appropriate time or to truly rehabilitate.
And if you add to all that the fact people now expect more for themselves regardless of merit and you have a *** storm.
Terrorism to the liberal hand wringers is no different to the shop lifter. Well that’s how it seems sometimes.
Liberalisation of the judiciary and fewer and more expensive prison spaces has contributed to it.
Be good and you get out early, shorter or no sentences for ‘low level entry level’ crimes, low value crimes not even investigated, life doesn’t mean life it just means your life sentence tags along not that you will be in prison for life.
It’s all a contribution but TBH we simply don’t have the resources to bang up for an appropriate time or to truly rehabilitate.
And if you add to all that the fact people now expect more for themselves regardless of merit and you have a *** storm.
Terrorism to the liberal hand wringers is no different to the shop lifter. Well that’s how it seems sometimes.
The longer you keep them in, the more radical they become, (though as long as they are locked up we know where they are & they aren't stabbing innocent people in the street!) It's looking at the problem from the wrong end, sanctions must be taken against the Muslim community from where I haven't heard a single outcry at these atrocities, it's as if they & their mullahs live in an entirely parallel society, which in a sense they do, & this must be addressed.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.