Donate SIGN UP

Well That Was A Waste Of Time!

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 09:56 Thu 06th Feb 2020 | News
61 Answers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51394383
just an act of spite from the Trump haters. Go Donald....
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 61rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Or, to put it another way, let's block evidence from being given and then find our chum innocent.
Question Author
whatever floats yer boat bhg!
i am glad, always thought this was on the cards
:o)
I suppose any trial that ends in acquittal could be called a waste of time. They might as well stop trying rape cases altogether, for instance: only 3% of allegations in London lead to a conviction. But I'd sooner they were tried, none the less.
and Palosi showed herself up BIG TIME, can't stand pettey childishness
*petty*
she ripped up his speech after he snubbed her, by not shaking hands, bit childish all round.
and stropped off mumbling to herself, Grow up silly woman !
Emmie //bit childish all round//
Would you want to shake hands with someone who tried to get you sacked ?
they were both at fault, but i wouldn't have ripped up his speech..
perhaps not Danny, but courtesy costs nothing, he could have proved to be the bigger politician.
Danny it was more her childish act that was seen around the world that I disliked
Why did Pelosi offer to shake hands when Trump handed her the copy of his address. The other guy, who was handed a copy right next to her, didn't try to upstage Trump with a false show of fraternity did he. She has guaranteed that Trump is re-elected. Some times it is hard to watch their antics and believe that they actually want to be in charge. Just like our own lefties, their conduct and policy statements look almost wilfully deranged. As if they know deep down that they are not fit, or prefer to be in opposition so that they can run interference constantly.
He treated her with the contempt she deserved. She, on the other hand, made herself look a fool.
bhg481 //Or, to put it another way, let's block e̶v̶i̶d̶e̶n̶c̶e̶ opinion from being given and then find our chum innocent.//

fify.
If it’s tit for tat then she started it by not announcing him in the time honoured fashion.

And let’s be honest here. How many people would shake hands with the person who is hell bent on ousting you and has called you all the names under the sun.

If I had been treated the way they have treated him I would be more scathing than he ever has been. And he has been very scathing.

But someone pointed out it is a crime to deface, destroy Etc a government document. Punishable with a $2,000 fine and or up to three years in prison. Bet nothing happens there.

In the first instance they don’t like the positives he said in the SOTU address. They say they are mistruths (whatever happened to plain old lies and truths?). But there mistruths can be as childish as calling out a third when it’s 31.9% and not 33.3%. And of course they don’t like their policies of sanctuary cities and states, pro abortion and anti law enforcement, anti military laws and pro illegal aliens laws and rhetoric being challenged.

Trump will be the US version of Thatcher. She still gets vilified from the grave by the left and hailed a heroin by the right.
Don't think spite is the driving motive behind these ludicrous prosecutions.
Deflection and self preservation, more like.
Due process means the house has to go through the legal process. They chose not to do so and said no innocent person blocks. That’s not true.

If you could see an investigation into you was so biased, so partisan, so one sided with the outcome already decided before they even started why would any sane person help? The text of the phone call is a case in pint. They started impeachment before that came out. Schiff had nothing so had to make up a transcript to convince the public. But the transcript was not the smoking gun it was supposed to be. So it became an issue of innuendo, supposition and feelings and not facts. How can any sane person want to help them in their own case when you know you are innocent.


The Democrats have acted in a facist like manner and would put the old Russia (possibly still who knows) to shame.

If they had had a fair hearing in the first place they would have everything they wanted. But they knew two things. 1. There was no actual evidence. 2. They couldn’t wait because they are desperate to get him on anything they possibly could because they know their presidential candidates are not capable of beating him at the ballot box.
"President Donald Trump has been found not guilty in his impeachment trial, ending a bid to remove him from office that bitterly divided the US."

End of.

1 to 20 of 61rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Well That Was A Waste Of Time!

Answer Question >>