Technology16 mins ago
School Tried Bodycams For Teachers
I do not think this is how teachers should be distancing themselves from pupils.
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ educati on/2020 /feb/07 /school s-trial -body-c ameras- to-aid- safety- and-mon itor-be haviour
https:/
Answers
TD, it seems we were at school in the same good old days - no pupils took knives to school, no pupils sat and texted their way all through lessons, no pupils openly defied the teacher...
15:27 Fri 07th Feb 2020
If (as a student) you see a teacher wearing a bodycam, what impression does that give, in the learning sense of the environment? A negative one. It indicates the teachers are battling the students, and need body cams to prove action etc.. like a teachers word wouldn't be good enough?
The only way you should distance pupils and students is with attire.
The only way you should distance pupils and students is with attire.
"They say it’s working so how can you argue."
Are you allowed to film school children at the school gates? Is that not a bit edgy?
I still oppose the whole scheme if it's just in the playground, just in the corridors or just at the gates. It is not needed and gives off a very common vibe and impression.
Are you allowed to film school children at the school gates? Is that not a bit edgy?
I still oppose the whole scheme if it's just in the playground, just in the corridors or just at the gates. It is not needed and gives off a very common vibe and impression.
//Reveal said one of the users, a secondary school in Hampshire that did not want to be named, wanted body cameras for safeguarding and security after staff and a student were attacked last year by outsiders, forcing the school into lockdown.
“The main reason we brought cameras in was not to deal with our own students but to deal with unknown children that came on to our site from other schools and the local community,” a deputy headteacher at the school said.//
“The main reason we brought cameras in was not to deal with our own students but to deal with unknown children that came on to our site from other schools and the local community,” a deputy headteacher at the school said.//
I don't believe one needs permission to photograph folk in public places. Suspect filming is covered by the same rules.
But there is major 'them and us' division when this sort of surveillance is adopted. If teachers were allowed to enforce discipline in the classroom instead of today's, " touch me and I'll sue, I know my rights", nonsense then this sort of thing wouldn't be even considered.
But there is major 'them and us' division when this sort of surveillance is adopted. If teachers were allowed to enforce discipline in the classroom instead of today's, " touch me and I'll sue, I know my rights", nonsense then this sort of thing wouldn't be even considered.
Rocky fact is if they wanted CCTV they would have attacked a camera to the gate not a teacher.
Also what if you needed to tell that teacher some sensitive information about yourself or someone else or a home situation and there is a camera recording all your words and actions and expressions? It'd put you off telling that teacher or going to them for help / advice.
Also what if you needed to tell that teacher some sensitive information about yourself or someone else or a home situation and there is a camera recording all your words and actions and expressions? It'd put you off telling that teacher or going to them for help / advice.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.