her murderer got life and must serve 17 years before being considered for parole, which means he could be out when he is middle aged..
I still can't understand why he can't be named..
Such a pretty girl who’d have had a life in front of her,a lethal injection should be given to him and all others who commit such heinous crimes, they’re not worthy of oxygen
Emmie, New Zealand has strict 'name suppression' laws for murder trials - it's normal for the name not to be released for two years. There's talk of changing the system.
he must have been bloody cold hearted to have murdered her then gone on another date, who on earth does that. his sentence is far too lenient in my opinion.
I think other countries' legal systems all have elements that baffle outsiders. I think the USA sentencing can be bizarre - 142 years imprisonment, say! Non-Britons must be puzzled by our 'sentenced to 10 years, you'll be released in 5' stuff.
Such a pretty girl who’d have had a life in front of her,a lethal injection should be given to him and all others who commit such heinous crimes, they’re not worthy of oxygen
The reasoning is that i) the police may be investigating other crimes this man has committed and has yet to be tried for and/or ii) he may successfully appeal. This means that he would be able to get on with life, get a job etc without prejudice.