Crosswords0 min ago
Guess Who's Furloughed Himself?
20 Answers
Lib dem peer, Lord Fox has furloughed himself but still takes £162 daily allowance for turning up. Also Steve Coogan has furloughed his staff at his £4m regency property in 75 acres of Sussex country. He is also worth £10m
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by lindapalmara. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.That’s not quite the full Lord Fox story though, is it.....
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/c oronavi rus-lor d-fox-p romises -to-rep ay-taxp ayers-m oney-af ter-fur loughin g-himse lf-1199 2475
I’m not sure what point your trying to make re Steve Coogan.
https:/
I’m not sure what point your trying to make re Steve Coogan.
Bad form for Lord Fox but for other 'rich' people I really dont see the problem.
True some have paid the wages themselves and they should be lauded for that, but where someone has taken advantage legally of a Government scheme I really dont thing we can critizise.
It's like the tax loopholes, the Government should fix them if there is a problem not just rely on morality.
As another point, many of these 'rich' people are not cash rich.
True some have paid the wages themselves and they should be lauded for that, but where someone has taken advantage legally of a Government scheme I really dont thing we can critizise.
It's like the tax loopholes, the Government should fix them if there is a problem not just rely on morality.
As another point, many of these 'rich' people are not cash rich.
OP are you trying to say that because someone is against the present Government, then they have no right to take advantage of a legal furlough scheme? Does that mean everyone that voted Labour at the last elections can't get furloughed? I don't care if someone is a millionaire or not -if they work and pay their taxes then they should get the same allowances at every other working person. Lord Fox probably pays more in taxes per year than most folk make in wages.
Of course Coogan has laid the gardener and maid off. Why not? The grass has stopped growing and the dust has stopped accumulating because of the virus. Plus you know how difficult it is to "self isolate" in a huge Regency property to do a bit of hoovering or to safely mow the grass on a 75acre estate without it being crowded and therefor unsafe. Odious creep wasn't acting when he played Partridge you know. He really is that man. The yanks got him right when he tried to con them into thinking he had something worth listening to. They described him as smug and vulgar(takes some doing to get called that over there) and said he was a "Sanctimonious, Pedantic, Incessantly outraged man of privilege".
This issue points less to the perceived 'unfairness' of anyone taking advantage, perfectly legally, of a scheme available to them, than to personal animosity towards the individual.
Some commentators, and I assume the OP, think that Steve Coogan is wrong because he is rich and has used the system to his advantage.
My point of view on this is always the same, when wealthy people are pilloried in this way -
At what point are you 'too rich' to have the same entitlements as people who are less rich than you?
Is it one million pounds? Two million?
The answer is, there is no cut-off point at which level a wealthy individual should not take advantage of a financial system that is available to them. They are entitled to do so, and their wealth does not exclude them, and nor should it.
For a system to be fair, it needs to include everyone to whom it is available.
If you don't like it, lobby the government to exclude anyone over a certain level of income from the system.
Until that happens, it is their right - as well as ours.
That's how democracy operates.
Some commentators, and I assume the OP, think that Steve Coogan is wrong because he is rich and has used the system to his advantage.
My point of view on this is always the same, when wealthy people are pilloried in this way -
At what point are you 'too rich' to have the same entitlements as people who are less rich than you?
Is it one million pounds? Two million?
The answer is, there is no cut-off point at which level a wealthy individual should not take advantage of a financial system that is available to them. They are entitled to do so, and their wealth does not exclude them, and nor should it.
For a system to be fair, it needs to include everyone to whom it is available.
If you don't like it, lobby the government to exclude anyone over a certain level of income from the system.
Until that happens, it is their right - as well as ours.
That's how democracy operates.
Hmm, the only references to the quote by Togo and used in the mail are in reference to the character played by Coogan in the series Happyish https:/ /www.me tacriti c.com/t v/happy ish/sea son-1/c ritic-r eviews
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.