News1 min ago
These Are The Rissoles That Now Rule Our Lives.....
69 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-engla nd-beds -bucks- herts-5 4431900
How thick do you have to be to maintain Jobsworthery in these circumstances? See what I mean? These ejjits are absolutely love the power they have been given. I think the bloke was remarkably restrained, I'd have decked the plonker.
How thick do you have to be to maintain Jobsworthery in these circumstances? See what I mean? These ejjits are absolutely love the power they have been given. I think the bloke was remarkably restrained, I'd have decked the plonker.
Answers
He enforced the emotionally vulnerable to separate at the crucial time when a distraught women needed comforting. It was a brutal and insensitive response to a ridiculous rule in those circumstance s. I wouldn’t have hit him, but I would have told him to go forth and multiply.
16:41 Tue 06th Oct 2020
// Social distancing for mourners
Social distancing measures reduce the transmission of COVID-19 and include:
- ensuring at least 2 metres (3 steps) away from others
- following the guidance on hand hygiene and preventing the spread of infection:
- face coverings must be worn by law in indoor places of worship, crematoria and burial ground chapels unless exempt for health, disability or other reasons.
https:/ /www.go v.uk/go vernmen t/publi cations /covid- 19-guid ance-fo r-manag ing-a-f uneral- during- the-cor onaviru s-pande mic/cov id-19-g uidance -for-ma naging- a-funer al-duri ng-the- coronav irus-pa ndemic
Vent your anger at Mr Hancock.
Social distancing measures reduce the transmission of COVID-19 and include:
- ensuring at least 2 metres (3 steps) away from others
- following the guidance on hand hygiene and preventing the spread of infection:
- face coverings must be worn by law in indoor places of worship, crematoria and burial ground chapels unless exempt for health, disability or other reasons.
https:/
Vent your anger at Mr Hancock.
sunk: "You are missing the point. The crematorium attendant didn’t make the rules, he is just there to make sure they are adhered to. He did his job correctly." - Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools. Yes there are rules but you have to use a bit of common. There can be no justice when rules are absolute.
wow is this the same TTT pure scientist
who was whining about me including Lagrange in the list of Nobel prise winner
anyway reader - this is about the three chairs at a funeral which was interrupted by a clerk telling two mourners to stop consoling the widow
and it seems quite clear that the council had made it clear he should do so
what really surprised me - - was that they had obviously got the video under a data protection request....
who was whining about me including Lagrange in the list of Nobel prise winner
anyway reader - this is about the three chairs at a funeral which was interrupted by a clerk telling two mourners to stop consoling the widow
and it seems quite clear that the council had made it clear he should do so
what really surprised me - - was that they had obviously got the video under a data protection request....
TTT - // sunk: "You are missing the point. The crematorium attendant didn’t make the rules, he is just there to make sure they are adhered to. He did his job correctly." - Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools. Yes there are rules but you have to use a bit of common. There can be no justice when rules are absolute. //
I completely understand that in this emotional situation, you, and others, feel that 'common sense' should have been applied.
The reality is, as others have advised, rules are made for the safety of everyone, and the attendant will have been instructed to enforce them.
Put yourself in his position - if he had 'relaxed' the rules and the contact information brought back the fact that people attending that funeral had been infected, he would have been receiving similar diatribes on here for not enforcing the rules.
I believe, as others have said, it is the rules that are flawed, not the required implementation of them.
I completely understand that in this emotional situation, you, and others, feel that 'common sense' should have been applied.
The reality is, as others have advised, rules are made for the safety of everyone, and the attendant will have been instructed to enforce them.
Put yourself in his position - if he had 'relaxed' the rules and the contact information brought back the fact that people attending that funeral had been infected, he would have been receiving similar diatribes on here for not enforcing the rules.
I believe, as others have said, it is the rules that are flawed, not the required implementation of them.
TTT - // There can be no justice when rules are absolute. //
That remark is going to haunt you the very next time you arrive on site to rage against some 'lenient' judge or other who has allowed the 'non-absolute' rules to free a criminal you believe should be swinging from a rope by morning.
You can't have it both ways.
That remark is going to haunt you the very next time you arrive on site to rage against some 'lenient' judge or other who has allowed the 'non-absolute' rules to free a criminal you believe should be swinging from a rope by morning.
You can't have it both ways.
TTT - // "The reality is, as others have advised, rules are made for the safety of everyone, and the attendant will have been instructed to enforce them. " - so why has he and his employers apologised? //
With the level of compassion that is a intrinsic part of what they do, I am sure the attendant and his employers are aware of the upset they have been forced to cause, and be human enough to feel sorry about it, even though that does not alter their requirement to do as instructed.
People enforce rules all day every day, they may not necessarily agree with all of them, and they may feel personally sorry that they are doing so, and say so, but that does not exempt them from following the rules in the first place.
With the level of compassion that is a intrinsic part of what they do, I am sure the attendant and his employers are aware of the upset they have been forced to cause, and be human enough to feel sorry about it, even though that does not alter their requirement to do as instructed.
People enforce rules all day every day, they may not necessarily agree with all of them, and they may feel personally sorry that they are doing so, and say so, but that does not exempt them from following the rules in the first place.
supermarkets didn't enforce the rules in their own shops, the council gave them a warning, and the council has been ticked off by the government.
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ politic s/2020/ oct/05/ row-aft er-lond on-coun cil-is- warned- off-enf orcing- mask-ru les-in- shops
So are these rules, laws, advice, or just something the government can announce then encourage people to ignore? The situation is ridiculous.
https:/
So are these rules, laws, advice, or just something the government can announce then encourage people to ignore? The situation is ridiculous.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.