News9 mins ago
Who
So , who won then?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Did you see this article from August, Jim?
https:/ /www.ro llingst one.com /politi cs/poli tical-c ommenta ry/covi d-19-en d-of-am erican- era-wad e-davis -103820 6/
A long article. In summary: everyone had lost even before the election.
https:/
A long article. In summary: everyone had lost even before the election.
As i predicted yesterday, Trump is claiming victory irrespective of the actual votes, and will look to his cronies in the supreme court to overturn the result if it goes against him.
Anyone still seeing anything other than a malignant Putin wannabe in DT, please get in touch because i am the owner of a large ornate bridge in London that i'd like to sell you.
Anyone still seeing anything other than a malignant Putin wannabe in DT, please get in touch because i am the owner of a large ornate bridge in London that i'd like to sell you.
Is this old news,fake news,Fox News or expected news? I have given up following US election coverage. Tooooo complicated. Hope Trump wins and there is No Mississippi burning.
https:/ /uk.yah oo.com/ news/tr ump-win s-swing -state- florida -065049 043.htm l
https:/
It's absolutely crazy that in some states (they all have their own rules) you can post your postal vote on the day of the election and it will be legitimate, even if it arrives 2 or 3 days later. No wonder there's acrimony and confusion.
In the UK, all postal votes must reach the polling station/returning officer by the close of the polling booths, usually 10pm.
Since the American people are choosing a national President, there should be national rules.
In the UK, all postal votes must reach the polling station/returning officer by the close of the polling booths, usually 10pm.
Since the American people are choosing a national President, there should be national rules.
"Probably, says the man with zero voting credibility."
Any chance you could, you know, not make stuff up?
* * * * * *
"Since the American people are choosing a national President, there should be national rules."
Agreed, but the national rules in question are that it's down to the States to set their own rules -- I think the other point is that the States more or less have the same status, within the US at least, of separate nations. It would more or less be an end to the "US" part to have a national set of standardised rules. You'd probably also want to junk the Electoral College, too, since that's partly designed to give the smaller States influence beyond their size.
Any chance you could, you know, not make stuff up?
* * * * * *
"Since the American people are choosing a national President, there should be national rules."
Agreed, but the national rules in question are that it's down to the States to set their own rules -- I think the other point is that the States more or less have the same status, within the US at least, of separate nations. It would more or less be an end to the "US" part to have a national set of standardised rules. You'd probably also want to junk the Electoral College, too, since that's partly designed to give the smaller States influence beyond their size.